http_interactions:
- request:
    method: get
    uri: https://api.iucnredlist.org/api/v4/green_status/all
    body:
      encoding: ''
      string: ''
    headers:
      User-Agent: r-curl/5.2.1 crul/1.5.0 rOpenSci(rredlist/0.7.1.9000)
      Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
      Accept: application/json, text/xml, application/xml, */*
      Authorization: My bearer token is safe
  response:
    status:
      status_code: '200'
      message: OK
      explanation: Request fulfilled, document follows
    headers:
      status: HTTP/1.1 200 OK
      cache-control: max-age=0, private, must-revalidate
      content-length: '146726'
      content-type: application/json
      etag: W/"b643365999e6fb6cc827e756a30305bd"
      x-request-id: 7e3ed6c1-2d06-4b2d-92af-d8875d2c491f
      x-runtime: '0.577590'
      date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 16:03:52 GMT
    body:
      encoding: ''
      file: no
      string: '{"assessments":[{"assessment_year":"2022","weights":"Default","justification":"\u003cp\u003eThe
        American Horseshoe Crab has a Species Recovery Score of 69% (Moderately Depleted).
        While it is Viable throughout much of its range, declines due to development,
        harvesting, climate change and sea level rise prevent it from being Functional
        save for in a few spatial units. Its Conservation Legacy is Indeterminate;
        though the best estimate is that conservation actions, including harvest management,
        have benefitted the species. The species has a Medium Conservation Gain and
        Dependence; within 10 years, the best estimate is that the species\u0026#39;
        score will increase to 83% with continued conservation, or decrease to 48%
        if it ceased. However, given the pressures of climate change, which affects
        spawning cues, and sea level rise, which reduces available spawning habitat,
        the species is expected in 100 years to lose those short-term gains, giving
        it a Recovery Potential of Zero.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFor additional
        data, see the \u003ca href=\u0026quot;https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/gss-supplementary\u0026quot;
        target=\u0026quot;_self\u0026quot;\u003eSupplementary Information\u003c/a\u003e
        document.\u003c/p\u003e","species_recovery_category":"Moderately Depleted","species_recovery_score_best":"69%","species_recovery_score_minimum":"60%","species_recovery_score_maximum":"93%","conservation_legacy_category":"Indeterminate","conservation_legacy_best":"24%","conservation_legacy_minimum":"-2%","conservation_legacy_maximum":"57%","conservation_dependence_category":"Medium","conservation_dependence_best":"21%","conservation_dependence_minimum":"0%","conservation_dependence_maximum":"69%","conservation_gain_category":"Medium","conservation_gain_best":"14%","conservation_gain_minimum":"-36%","conservation_gain_maximum":"36%","recovery_potential_category":"Zero","recovery_potential_best":"0%","recovery_potential_minimum":"-69%","recovery_potential_maximum":"38%","assessor_names":"Smith,
        D., Brockmann, J., Carmichael, R., Hallerman, E., Watson, W. \u0026 Zald\u0026iacute;var-Rae,
        J.","reviewer_names":"Botton, M. \u0026 Grace, M.K.","contributors":null,"facilitators":"Grace,
        M.K. \u0026 Young, R.E.","compilers":null,"url":"https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/11987/80159830","assessment_date":"2022-07-21","taxon":{"sis_id":11987,"scientific_name":"Limulus
        polyphemus","species_taxa":[],"subpopulation_taxa":[],"infrarank_taxa":[],"kingdom_name":"ANIMALIA","phylum_name":"ARTHROPODA","class_name":"MEROSTOMATA","order_name":"XIPHOSURA","family_name":"LIMULIDAE","genus_name":"Limulus","species_name":"polyphemus","subpopulation_name":null,"infra_name":null,"authority":"(Linnaeus,
        1758)","species":true,"subpopulation":false,"infrarank":false,"ssc_groups":[{"name":"IUCN
        SSC Horseshoe Crab Specialist Group","url":null,"description":"Co-Chairs:
        Mark L. Botton (email: botton@fordham.edu) and Paul K.S. Shin (email: paulksshin@gmail.com)\nRed
        List Authority Coordinator: Dave Smith (email: drsmith@usgs.gov)"}],"common_names":[{"main":false,"name":"Atlantic
        Horseshoe Crab","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Horseshoe
        Crab","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}},{"main":true,"name":"American
        Horseshoe Crab","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}}],"synonyms":[{"name":"Monoculus
        polyphemus Linnaeus, 1758","status":"ACCEPTED","genus_name":"Monoculus","species_name":"polyphemus","species_author":"Linnaeus,
        1758","infrarank_author":null,"subpopulation_name":null,"infra_type":null,"infra_name":null}]}},{"assessment_year":"2021","weights":"Default","justification":"\u003cp\u003eEncino
        Arroyero\u0026#39;s Species Recovery Score of 33% (Largely Depleted) is due
        to low recruitment and an age structure skewed toward very old individuals,
        preventing the species from being Viable in any of its spatial units (instead,
        it is Present in all of them). Encino Arroyero has a Conservation Legacy of
        Zero due to the species\u0026#39; extremely long generation time and continued
        threats, even within protected areas. Because of the possible states that
        casn be assigned in the Green Status assessment, there is also Zero Conservation
        Dependence; if conservation actions were to stop, it is expected that the
        species would indeed decline majorly over a 10-year period, but likely some
        individuals would remain, which would mean the species was still Present in
        all of its spatial units. Encino Arroyero has a Medium Conservation Gain;
        within a 10-year period, if proposed bans on cutting down these trees are
        implemented, and planned seedling planting is carried out, it is expected
        that the species could become Viable in some of its spatial units, leading
        to a score of 44%. Finally, within 100 years it would be possible for Encino
        Arroyero to become Functional in two spatial units and Viable in most, leading
        to a score of 78%. Therefore, the Recovery Potential for Encino Arroyero is
        High.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFor additional data, see the \u003ca href=\u0026quot;https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/gss-supplementary\u0026quot;
        target=\u0026quot;_self\u0026quot;\u003eSupplementary Information\u003c/a\u003e
        document.\u003c/p\u003e","species_recovery_category":"Largely Depleted","species_recovery_score_best":"33%","species_recovery_score_minimum":"33%","species_recovery_score_maximum":"33%","conservation_legacy_category":"Zero","conservation_legacy_best":"0%","conservation_legacy_minimum":"0%","conservation_legacy_maximum":"17%","conservation_dependence_category":"Zero","conservation_dependence_best":"0%","conservation_dependence_minimum":"0%","conservation_dependence_maximum":"33%","conservation_gain_category":"Medium","conservation_gain_best":"11%","conservation_gain_minimum":"0%","conservation_gain_maximum":"11%","recovery_potential_category":"High","recovery_potential_best":"44%","recovery_potential_minimum":"11%","recovery_potential_maximum":"67%","assessor_names":"Alvarez-Clare,
        S.A.C., Carrero, C. \u0026 Perez Morales, D.W.","reviewer_names":"Gonz\u0026aacute;lez
        Rodriguez, A. \u0026 Grace, M.K.","contributors":null,"facilitators":"Grace,
        M.K.","compilers":null,"url":"https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/30726/2795363","assessment_date":"2021-10-31","taxon":{"sis_id":30726,"scientific_name":"Quercus
        brandegeei","species_taxa":[],"subpopulation_taxa":[],"infrarank_taxa":[],"kingdom_name":"PLANTAE","phylum_name":"TRACHEOPHYTA","class_name":"MAGNOLIOPSIDA","order_name":"FAGALES","family_name":"FAGACEAE","genus_name":"Quercus","species_name":"brandegeei","subpopulation_name":null,"infra_name":null,"authority":"Goldman","species":true,"subpopulation":false,"infrarank":false,"ssc_groups":[],"common_names":[{"main":true,"name":"Encino
        Arroyero","language":{"code":"spa","description":{"en":"Spanish; Castilian"}}}],"synonyms":[]}},{"assessment_year":"2021","weights":"Default","justification":"\u003cp\u003eThe
        Species Recovery Score of 79% (Moderately Depleted) is due to Alpine Ibex
        having been restored to functionality in five out of eight spatial units.
        Alpine Ibex has a High Conservation Legacy; without past conservation action,
        the Alpine Ibex would almost certainly be extinct today as the result of intense
        hunting pressure between the 16th and 19th centuries. There is a Low Conservation
        Dependence; if conservation actions were to stop, it is expected that the
        species would not show much change over a 10-year period, falling only to
        75%. The Alpine Ibex has a Conservation Gain of Zero; while there are plans
        to bolster the genetic diversity of the species, it is not expected that effects
        large enough to change the state in a spatial unit would be seen within a
        10-year period. Finally, within 100 years it would be possible for the Alpine
        Ibex to become at least Viable in all spatial units, and Functional in most,
        leading to a score of 88%. This makes the Recovery Potential for Alpine Ibex
        Low, relative to the current score.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFor additional
        data, see the \u003ca href=\u0026quot;https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/gss-supplementary\u0026quot;
        target=\u0026quot;_self\u0026quot;\u003eSupplementary Information\u003c/a\u003e
        document.\u003c/p\u003e","species_recovery_category":"Moderately Depleted","species_recovery_score_best":"79%","species_recovery_score_minimum":"75%","species_recovery_score_maximum":"83%","conservation_legacy_category":"High","conservation_legacy_best":"79%","conservation_legacy_minimum":"71%","conservation_legacy_maximum":"83%","conservation_dependence_category":"Low","conservation_dependence_best":"4%","conservation_dependence_minimum":"0%","conservation_dependence_maximum":"42%","conservation_gain_category":"Zero","conservation_gain_best":"0%","conservation_gain_minimum":"-8%","conservation_gain_maximum":"13%","recovery_potential_category":"Low","recovery_potential_best":"8%","recovery_potential_minimum":"-17%","recovery_potential_maximum":"25%","assessor_names":"Brambilla,
        A., Bassano, B., Biebach, I., Cavailhes, J., Gressmann, G., Grossen, C., Keller,
        L., Toïgo, C. \u0026 von Hardenberg, A.","reviewer_names":"Milner-Gulland,
        E.J., Mallon, D.P. \u0026 Grace, M.K.","contributors":null,"facilitators":"Grace,
        M.K.","compilers":"Wynter, V.","url":"https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/42397/161916377","assessment_date":"2021-10-31","taxon":{"sis_id":42397,"scientific_name":"Capra
        ibex","species_taxa":[],"subpopulation_taxa":[],"infrarank_taxa":[],"kingdom_name":"ANIMALIA","phylum_name":"CHORDATA","class_name":"MAMMALIA","order_name":"ARTIODACTYLA","family_name":"BOVIDAE","genus_name":"Capra","species_name":"ibex","subpopulation_name":null,"infra_name":null,"authority":"Linnaeus,
        1758","species":true,"subpopulation":false,"infrarank":false,"ssc_groups":[],"common_names":[{"main":false,"name":"Alpensteinbock","language":{"code":"ger","description":{"en":"German"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Bouquetin
        des Alpes","language":{"code":"fre","description":{"en":"French"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Íbice
        de los Alpes","language":{"code":"spa","description":{"en":"Spanish; Castilian"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Stambecco
        alpino","language":{"code":"ita","description":{"en":"Italian"}}},{"main":true,"name":"Alpine
        Ibex","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}}],"synonyms":[]}},{"assessment_year":"2021","weights":"Default","justification":"\u003cp\u003eThe
        Royle\u0026#39;s Pika has a Species Recovery Score of 83% (Slightly Depleted)
        because although it is widespread and found in large numbers, recent climate-related
        changes have caused this montane species to experience a genetic bottleneck
        across at least some parts of its range, which may reduce the species\u0026#39;
        fitness. Because no conservation actions have been carried out, or are planned,
        for the Royle\u0026#39;s Pika, the species\u0026#39; Conservation Legacy,
        Conservation Dependence; and Conservation Gain are all Zero. However, within
        100 years it would be possible for genetic restoration to recover the species\u0026#39;
        to functionality across its range, leading to a score of 100%. Therefore,
        the Recovery Potential for The Royle\u0026#39;s Pika is Medium. However, climate
        change could threaten the achievement of that long-term recovery, and the
        confidence interval around the Recovery Potential estimate is wide.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFor
        additional data, see the \u003ca href=\u0026quot;https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/gss-supplementary\u0026quot;
        target=\u0026quot;_self\u0026quot;\u003eSupplementary Information\u003c/a\u003e
        document.\u003c/p\u003e","species_recovery_category":"Slightly Depleted","species_recovery_score_best":"83%","species_recovery_score_minimum":"67%","species_recovery_score_maximum":"100%","conservation_legacy_category":"Zero","conservation_legacy_best":"0%","conservation_legacy_minimum":"-33%","conservation_legacy_maximum":"33%","conservation_dependence_category":"Zero","conservation_dependence_best":"0%","conservation_dependence_minimum":"-33%","conservation_dependence_maximum":"33%","conservation_gain_category":"Zero","conservation_gain_best":"0%","conservation_gain_minimum":"-33%","conservation_gain_maximum":"33%","recovery_potential_category":"Medium","recovery_potential_best":"17%","recovery_potential_minimum":"-67%","recovery_potential_maximum":"33%","assessor_names":"Bhattacharya,
        S. \u0026 Dahal, N.","reviewer_names":"Smith, A.T. \u0026 Grace, M.K.","contributors":null,"facilitators":"Grace,
        M.K.","compilers":null,"url":"https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/41268/45184591","assessment_date":"2021-10-31","taxon":{"sis_id":41268,"scientific_name":"Ochotona
        roylei","species_taxa":[],"subpopulation_taxa":[],"infrarank_taxa":[],"kingdom_name":"ANIMALIA","phylum_name":"CHORDATA","class_name":"MAMMALIA","order_name":"LAGOMORPHA","family_name":"OCHOTONIDAE","genus_name":"Ochotona","species_name":"roylei","subpopulation_name":null,"infra_name":null,"authority":"(Ogilby,
        1839)","species":true,"subpopulation":false,"infrarank":false,"ssc_groups":[{"name":"IUCN
        SSC Lagomorph Specialist Group (rabbits, pikas and hares)","url":"https://www.lagomorphspecialistgroup.org/","description":"Co-Chaisr:
        Andrew T. Smith (email: a.smith@asu.edu) and Hayley Lanier (email: hclanier@ou.edu)\nRed
        List Authority Coordinator: Charlotte Johnston (email: Charlotte.Johnston@asu.edu)"}],"common_names":[{"main":false,"name":"Himalayan
        Mouse Hare","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Hui
        Shutu","language":{"code":"chi","description":{"en":"Chinese"}}},{"main":true,"name":"Royle''s
        Pika","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}}],"synonyms":[{"name":"Ochotona
        himalayana Feng, 1973","status":"ACCEPTED","genus_name":"Ochotona","species_name":"himalayana","species_author":"Feng,
        1973","infrarank_author":null,"subpopulation_name":null,"infra_type":null,"infra_name":null}]}},{"assessment_year":"2021","weights":"Default","justification":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eRhinoderma
        darwinii\u003c/em\u003e\u0026#39;s Species Recovery Score of 17% (Critically
        Depleted) is due to the species having been extirpated over the majority of
        its indigenous range, and threatened in many of the pockets where it does
        remain. \u003cem\u003eR. darwinii\u003c/em\u003e has a High Conservation Legacy;
        without past conservation action, it is expected that \u003cem\u003eR. darwinii\u003c/em\u003e
        would be nearly extinct today, with a score of just 3%. There is a High Conservation
        Dependence; if species and habitat protection were to stop, it is expected
        that habitat loss and degradation would occur in many areas where the species
        remains over a 10-year period, bringing the score to 2%. \u003cem\u003eRhinoderma
        darwinii\u003c/em\u003e has a Conservation Gain of Zero; within a 10-year
        period it is expected that planned conservation actions, while beneficial,
        would primarily work to prevent further decline over that time period. Finally,
        within 100 years it would be possible for \u003cem\u003eR. darwinii\u003c/em\u003e
        to be reintroduced in some parts of the range where habitat remains or could
        be restored, and that it could be recovered to ecologically functional populations
        in parts of its range, leading to a score of 60%. Therefore, the Recovery
        Potential for \u003cem\u003eR. darwinii\u003c/em\u003e is High.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFor
        additional data, see the \u003ca href=\u0026quot;https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/gss-supplementary\u0026quot;
        target=\u0026quot;_self\u0026quot;\u003eSupplementary Information\u003c/a\u003e
        document.\u003c/p\u003e","species_recovery_category":"Critically Depleted","species_recovery_score_best":"17%","species_recovery_score_minimum":"12%","species_recovery_score_maximum":"26%","conservation_legacy_category":"High","conservation_legacy_best":"14%","conservation_legacy_minimum":"-10%","conservation_legacy_maximum":"25%","conservation_dependence_category":"High","conservation_dependence_best":"15%","conservation_dependence_minimum":"-9%","conservation_dependence_maximum":"26%","conservation_gain_category":"Zero","conservation_gain_best":"0%","conservation_gain_minimum":"-14%","conservation_gain_maximum":"16%","recovery_potential_category":"High","recovery_potential_best":"43%","recovery_potential_minimum":"0%","recovery_potential_maximum":"61%","assessor_names":"Azat,
        C. \u0026 Valenzuela-S\u0026aacute;nchez, A.","reviewer_names":"Crump, M.L.
        \u0026 Grace, M.K.","contributors":null,"facilitators":"Grace, M.K.","compilers":null,"url":"https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/19513/79809372","assessment_date":"2021-10-31","taxon":{"sis_id":19513,"scientific_name":"Rhinoderma
        darwinii","species_taxa":[],"subpopulation_taxa":[],"infrarank_taxa":[],"kingdom_name":"ANIMALIA","phylum_name":"CHORDATA","class_name":"AMPHIBIA","order_name":"ANURA","family_name":"RHINODERMATIDAE","genus_name":"Rhinoderma","species_name":"darwinii","subpopulation_name":null,"infra_name":null,"authority":"Duméril
        \u0026amp; Bibron, 1841","species":true,"subpopulation":false,"infrarank":false,"ssc_groups":[{"name":"IUCN
        SSC Amphibian Specialist Group","url":"https://www.iucn-amphibians.org/","description":"Chair:
        Ariadne Angulo (email: aangulo@amphibians.org)\nRed List Authority Coordinator:
        Jennifer Luedtke (email: jluedtke@amphibians.org)\nNewsletter: http://www.amphibians.org/froglog/"}],"common_names":[{"main":false,"name":"Darwin''s
        Frog","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Rana
        Narigona","language":{"code":"spa","description":{"en":"Spanish; Castilian"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Ranita
        de Darwin","language":{"code":"spa","description":{"en":"Spanish; Castilian"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Sapito
        Partero","language":{"code":"spa","description":{"en":"Spanish; Castilian"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Sapito
        Vaquero","language":{"code":"spa","description":{"en":"Spanish; Castilian"}}},{"main":true,"name":"Southern
        Darwin''s Frog","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}}],"synonyms":[]}},{"assessment_year":"2021","weights":"Default","justification":"\u003cp\u003eThe
        Saiga\u0026#39;s Species Recovery Score of 38% (Largely Depleted) is due to
        extirpation across some parts of its indigenous range, as well as the fact
        that the species is threatened in most areas where it remains extant.The Saiga
        has a Medium Conservation Legacy; without past conservation action, the Saiga
        would likely have gone extinct in one spatial unit, and would have lost viability
        and functionality in others, resulting in a score of 19%. However, the positive
        effects of conservation have been masked somewhat by disease outbreaks, which
        have knocked the species back to levels lower than what had been achieved
        through concerted conservation. There is a Medium Conservation Dependence;
        if conservation actions like habitat protections and veterinary care were
        to stop, it is expected that the species\u0026#39; status would deteriorate
        in most spatial units over a 10-year period, bringing the score to 19%. The
        Saiga also has a Medium Conservation Gain: within a 10-year period, if conservation
        continues, it is expected that one more spatial unit will become Viable and
        one more will become Functional; combined with the planned reintroduction
        to a spatial unit where the species is currently Absent, a score of 52% is
        expected to be achieved. Finally, within 100 years it would be possible for
        the Saiga to achieve a score of 52%; while some areas of the indigenous range
        are unlikely to provide suitable habitat in the long term, where there is
        suitable habitat it will be possible for the species to become Viable or Functional
        in many cases. Therefore, the Recovery Potential for the Saiga is Medium.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFor
        additional data, see the \u003ca href=\u0026quot;https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/gss-supplementary\u0026quot;
        target=\u0026quot;_self\u0026quot;\u003eSupplementary Information\u003c/a\u003e
        document.\u003c/p\u003e","species_recovery_category":"Largely Depleted","species_recovery_score_best":"38%","species_recovery_score_minimum":"33%","species_recovery_score_maximum":"52%","conservation_legacy_category":"Medium","conservation_legacy_best":"19%","conservation_legacy_minimum":"10%","conservation_legacy_maximum":"48%","conservation_dependence_category":"Medium","conservation_dependence_best":"19%","conservation_dependence_minimum":"5%","conservation_dependence_maximum":"52%","conservation_gain_category":"Medium","conservation_gain_best":"14%","conservation_gain_minimum":"-24%","conservation_gain_maximum":"33%","recovery_potential_category":"Medium","recovery_potential_best":"24%","recovery_potential_minimum":"0%","recovery_potential_maximum":"52%","assessor_names":"Milner-Gulland,
        E.J.","reviewer_names":"Mallon, D.P. \u0026 Grace, M.K.","contributors":null,"facilitators":"Grace,
        M.K.","compilers":"Wynter, V.","url":"https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/19832/233712210","assessment_date":"2021-10-31","taxon":{"sis_id":19832,"scientific_name":"Saiga
        tatarica","species_taxa":[],"subpopulation_taxa":[],"infrarank_taxa":[{"sis_id":19833,"scientific_name":"Saiga
        tatarica ssp. mongolica","kingdom_name":"ANIMALIA","phylum_name":"CHORDATA","class_name":"MAMMALIA","order_name":"ARTIODACTYLA","family_name":"BOVIDAE","genus_name":"Saiga","species_name":"tatarica","subpopulation_name":null,"infra_name":"mongolica","authority":"Bannikov,
        1946","ssc_groups":[],"common_names":[{"main":false,"name":"Mongol Bokhon","language":{"code":"mon","description":{"en":"Mongolian"}}},{"main":true,"name":"Mongolian
        Saiga","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}}],"synonyms":[{"name":"Saiga
        mongolica Bannikov, 1946","status":"ACCEPTED","genus_name":"Saiga","species_name":"mongolica","species_author":"Bannikov,
        1946","infrarank_author":null,"subpopulation_name":null,"infra_type":null,"infra_name":null}]},{"sis_id":19834,"scientific_name":"Saiga
        tatarica ssp. tatarica","kingdom_name":"ANIMALIA","phylum_name":"CHORDATA","class_name":"MAMMALIA","order_name":"ARTIODACTYLA","family_name":"BOVIDAE","genus_name":"Saiga","species_name":"tatarica","subpopulation_name":null,"infra_name":"tatarica","authority":"(Linnaeus,
        1766)","ssc_groups":[],"common_names":[{"main":true,"name":"Saiga","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}}],"synonyms":[]}],"kingdom_name":"ANIMALIA","phylum_name":"CHORDATA","class_name":"MAMMALIA","order_name":"ARTIODACTYLA","family_name":"BOVIDAE","genus_name":"Saiga","species_name":"tatarica","subpopulation_name":null,"infra_name":null,"authority":"(Linnaeus,
        1766)","species":true,"subpopulation":false,"infrarank":false,"ssc_groups":[],"common_names":[{"main":false,"name":"Mongolian
        Saiga","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Saiga","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Saiga","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Saiga","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Saiga
        Antelope","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Saiga
        Antelope","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Saiga
        Antelope","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Ak
        bokon","language":{"code":"kaz","description":{"en":"Kazakh"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Antilope
        Saiga","language":{"code":"spa","description":{"en":"Spanish; Castilian"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Antílope
        Saiga","language":{"code":"spa","description":{"en":"Spanish; Castilian"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Mongol
        bokhon","language":{"code":"mon","description":{"en":"Mongolian"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Saiga","language":{"code":"fre","description":{"en":"French"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Saiga","language":{"code":"spa","description":{"en":"Spanish;
        Castilian"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Saiga","language":{"code":"spa","description":{"en":"Spanish;
        Castilian"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Saïga","language":{"code":"fre","description":{"en":"French"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Saïga","language":{"code":"fre","description":{"en":"French"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Saïga","language":{"code":"fre","description":{"en":"French"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Saigak","language":{"code":"rus","description":{"en":"Russian"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Saigak","language":{"code":"rus","description":{"en":"Russian"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Saigak","language":{"code":"rus","description":{"en":"Russian"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Saigak","language":{"code":"rus","description":{"en":"Russian"}}},{"main":true,"name":"Saiga","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}}],"synonyms":[{"name":"Ibex
        imberbis Gmelin, 1760 [unavailable]","status":"ACCEPTED","genus_name":"Ibex","species_name":"imberbis","species_author":"Gmelin,
        1760 [unavailable]","infrarank_author":null,"subpopulation_name":null,"infra_type":null,"infra_name":null},{"name":"Capra
        tatarica Linnaeus, 1766","status":"ACCEPTED","genus_name":"Capra","species_name":"tatarica","species_author":"Linnaeus,
        1766","infrarank_author":null,"subpopulation_name":null,"infra_type":null,"infra_name":null}]}},{"assessment_year":"2021","weights":"Default","justification":"\u003cp\u003eThe
        African Penguin\u0026#39;s Species Recovery Score of 33% represents the species\u0026#39;
        threatened status in all of its spatial units; the species has greatly declined
        since the late 1800s, first from egg collecting and guano scraping and later,
        in the mid-1900s, due to industrial fishing. The African Penguin has a High
        Conservation Legacy; without protected areas, the African Penguin would possibly
        be extinct today. Conservation Dependence and Conservation Gain are both Zero:
        the species would likely not disappear from any spatial units within 10 years
        without conservation; with conservation, the species is not expected to become
        Viable in any spatial units within 10 years, given the species\u0026#39; slow
        reproduction. However, within 100 years it would be possible for the African
        Penguin to become Viable in three out of four spatial units, leading to a
        score of 58%. Therefore, the Recovery Potential for the African Penguin is
        Medium.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFor additional data, see the \u003ca href=\u0026quot;https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/gss-supplementary\u0026quot;
        target=\u0026quot;_self\u0026quot;\u003eSupplementary Information\u003c/a\u003e
        document.\u003c/p\u003e","species_recovery_category":"Largely Depleted","species_recovery_score_best":"33%","species_recovery_score_minimum":"33%","species_recovery_score_maximum":"33%","conservation_legacy_category":"High","conservation_legacy_best":"33%","conservation_legacy_minimum":"0%","conservation_legacy_maximum":"33%","conservation_dependence_category":"Zero","conservation_dependence_best":"0%","conservation_dependence_minimum":"0%","conservation_dependence_maximum":"33%","conservation_gain_category":"Zero","conservation_gain_best":"0%","conservation_gain_minimum":"-8%","conservation_gain_maximum":"0%","recovery_potential_category":"Medium","recovery_potential_best":"25%","recovery_potential_minimum":"0%","recovery_potential_maximum":"58%","assessor_names":"Hagen,
        C., McInnes, A., Waller, L.J. \u0026 Stephenson, P.J.","reviewer_names":"Garcia
        Borboroglu, P., IUCN SSC Penguin Specialist Group \u0026 Grace, M.K.","contributors":null,"facilitators":"Grace,
        M.K.","compilers":null,"url":"https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/22697810/157423361","assessment_date":"2021-10-31","taxon":{"sis_id":22697810,"scientific_name":"Spheniscus
        demersus","species_taxa":[],"subpopulation_taxa":[],"infrarank_taxa":[],"kingdom_name":"ANIMALIA","phylum_name":"CHORDATA","class_name":"AVES","order_name":"SPHENISCIFORMES","family_name":"SPHENISCIDAE","genus_name":"Spheniscus","species_name":"demersus","subpopulation_name":null,"infra_name":null,"authority":"(Linnaeus,
        1758)","species":true,"subpopulation":false,"infrarank":false,"ssc_groups":[{"name":"IUCN
        SSC Bird Red List Authority (BirdLife International)","url":"https://www.birdlife.org/","description":"Red
        List Authority Coordinator: Ian Burfield (ian.burfield@birdlife.org)"}],"common_names":[{"main":false,"name":"Black-footed
        Penguin","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Jackass
        Penguin","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Manchot
        du Cap","language":{"code":"fre","description":{"en":"French"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Pingüino
        del Cabo","language":{"code":"spa","description":{"en":"Spanish; Castilian"}}},{"main":true,"name":"African
        Penguin","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}}],"synonyms":[]}},{"assessment_year":"2021","weights":"Default","justification":"\u003cp\u003eThe
        Greater Prairie-chicken\u0026#39;s Species Recovery Score of 50% (Largely
        Depleted) is due to the species only being ecologically Functional in two
        of its six spatial units, and one subspecies, the Heath Hen, is extinct. The
        Greater Prairie-chicken has a Medium Conservation Legacy; without past actions
        of captive breeding programmes and translocations, the Greater Prairie-chicken
        would have a score of 39% today. There is a Low Conservation Dependence; if
        conservation actions were to stop, it is expected that the species would lose
        functionality in one spatial unit, bringing the score to 44%. The Greater
        Prairie-chicken has a Conservation Gain of Zero; even with planned conservation,
        it is unlikely that spatial units which are not already Functional would achieve
        viability or functionality in 10 years\u0026#39; time. Even within 100 years,
        it is expected that the Greater Prairie-chicken could achieve viability in
        just one additional spatial unit; a substantial part of the range is too degraded
        to restore. Therefore, the Recovery Potential for the Greater Prairie-chicken
        is Low.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFor additional data, see the \u003ca href=\u0026quot;https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/gss-supplementary\u0026quot;
        target=\u0026quot;_self\u0026quot;\u003eSupplementary Information\u003c/a\u003e
        document.\u003c/p\u003e","species_recovery_category":"Largely Depleted","species_recovery_score_best":"50%","species_recovery_score_minimum":"39%","species_recovery_score_maximum":"56%","conservation_legacy_category":"Medium","conservation_legacy_best":"11%","conservation_legacy_minimum":"-17%","conservation_legacy_maximum":"33%","conservation_dependence_category":"Low","conservation_dependence_best":"6%","conservation_dependence_minimum":"-11%","conservation_dependence_maximum":"39%","conservation_gain_category":"Zero","conservation_gain_best":"0%","conservation_gain_minimum":"-17%","conservation_gain_maximum":"22%","recovery_potential_category":"Low","recovery_potential_best":"6%","recovery_potential_minimum":"-28%","recovery_potential_maximum":"22%","assessor_names":"Berger,
        D.","reviewer_names":"Hermes, C. \u0026 Grace, M.K.","contributors":"Gregory,
        A.","facilitators":"Grace, M.K.","compilers":null,"url":"https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/22679514/177901079","assessment_date":"2021-10-31","taxon":{"sis_id":22679514,"scientific_name":"Tympanuchus
        cupido","species_taxa":[],"subpopulation_taxa":[],"infrarank_taxa":[],"kingdom_name":"ANIMALIA","phylum_name":"CHORDATA","class_name":"AVES","order_name":"GALLIFORMES","family_name":"PHASIANIDAE","genus_name":"Tympanuchus","species_name":"cupido","subpopulation_name":null,"infra_name":null,"authority":"(Linnaeus,
        1758)","species":true,"subpopulation":false,"infrarank":false,"ssc_groups":[{"name":"IUCN
        SSC Bird Red List Authority (BirdLife International)","url":"https://www.birdlife.org/","description":"Red
        List Authority Coordinator: Ian Burfield (ian.burfield@birdlife.org)"}],"common_names":[{"main":false,"name":"Greater
        Prairie Chicken","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Greater
        Prairie-Chicken","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}},{"main":true,"name":"Greater
        Prairie-chicken","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}}],"synonyms":[{"name":"Tetrao
        cupido Linnaeus, 1758","status":"ACCEPTED","genus_name":"Tetrao","species_name":"cupido","species_author":"Linnaeus,
        1758","infrarank_author":null,"subpopulation_name":null,"infra_type":null,"infra_name":null}]}},{"assessment_year":"2021","weights":"Default","justification":"\u003cp\u003eThe
        Vicu\u0026ntilde;a\u0026#39;s Species Recovery Score of 67% (Moderately Depleted)
        reflects widespread past decimation of the species for its valuable wool;
        only in the last decades has the species been restored to Viable populations
        across its range thanks to legal protection from hunting, an international
        trade ban, and the introduction of sustainable livelihood schemes. The Vicu\u0026ntilde;a
        has a High Conservation Legacy; without this past conservation action, the
        Vicu\u0026ntilde;a would almost certainly be close to extinction today, with
        a score of only 8%. There is a Medium Conservation Dependence; poaching remains
        a threat, and if conservation actions were to stop, it is expected that the
        species could become threatened across its range once more within a 10-year
        period, bringing the score to 33%. The Vicu\u0026ntilde;a has a Medium Conservation
        Gain; within a 10-year period, if conservation continues, it is expected that
        the species could become Functional in three of four spatial units, leading
        to a score of 92%. Finally, within 100 years it would be possible for the
        Vicu\u0026ntilde;a to become Fully Recovered; relative to the current score,
        this represents a Medium Recovery Potential.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFor
        additional data, see the \u003ca href=\u0026quot;https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/gss-supplementary\u0026quot;
        target=\u0026quot;_self\u0026quot;\u003eSupplementary Information\u003c/a\u003e
        document.","species_recovery_category":"Moderately Depleted","species_recovery_score_best":"67%","species_recovery_score_minimum":"67%","species_recovery_score_maximum":"100%","conservation_legacy_category":"High","conservation_legacy_best":"58%","conservation_legacy_minimum":"33%","conservation_legacy_maximum":"100%","conservation_dependence_category":"Medium","conservation_dependence_best":"33%","conservation_dependence_minimum":"8%","conservation_dependence_maximum":"92%","conservation_gain_category":"Medium","conservation_gain_best":"25%","conservation_gain_minimum":"-33%","conservation_gain_maximum":"33%","recovery_potential_category":"Medium","recovery_potential_best":"33%","recovery_potential_minimum":"-33%","recovery_potential_maximum":"33%","assessor_names":"Acebes,
        P. \u0026 Gonzalez, B.","reviewer_names":"Vil\u0026aacute;, B. \u0026 Grace,
        M.K.","contributors":null,"facilitators":"Grace, M.K.","compilers":null,"url":"https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/22956/145360542","assessment_date":"2021-10-31","taxon":{"sis_id":22956,"scientific_name":"Vicugna
        vicugna","species_taxa":[],"subpopulation_taxa":[],"infrarank_taxa":[{"sis_id":22957,"scientific_name":"Vicugna
        vicugna ssp. mensalis","kingdom_name":"ANIMALIA","phylum_name":"CHORDATA","class_name":"MAMMALIA","order_name":"ARTIODACTYLA","family_name":"CAMELIDAE","genus_name":"Vicugna","species_name":"vicugna","subpopulation_name":null,"infra_name":"mensalis","authority":"(Thomas,
        1917)","ssc_groups":[],"common_names":[],"synonyms":[]},{"sis_id":22958,"scientific_name":"Vicugna
        vicugna ssp. vicugna","kingdom_name":"ANIMALIA","phylum_name":"CHORDATA","class_name":"MAMMALIA","order_name":"ARTIODACTYLA","family_name":"CAMELIDAE","genus_name":"Vicugna","species_name":"vicugna","subpopulation_name":null,"infra_name":"vicugna","authority":"(Molina,
        1782)","ssc_groups":[],"common_names":[],"synonyms":[]}],"kingdom_name":"ANIMALIA","phylum_name":"CHORDATA","class_name":"MAMMALIA","order_name":"ARTIODACTYLA","family_name":"CAMELIDAE","genus_name":"Vicugna","species_name":"vicugna","subpopulation_name":null,"infra_name":null,"authority":"(Molina,
        1782)","species":true,"subpopulation":false,"infrarank":false,"ssc_groups":[],"common_names":[{"main":false,"name":"Vicugna","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Vicuña","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Huari","language":{"code":"aym","description":{"en":"Aymara"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Vigogne","language":{"code":"fre","description":{"en":"French"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Wik''uña","language":{"code":"que","description":{"en":"Quechua"}}},{"main":true,"name":"Vicuna","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}}],"synonyms":[]}},{"assessment_year":"2021","weights":"Default","justification":"\u003cp\u003eThe
        Species Recovery Score of 33% (Largely Depleted) is due to the Cheer Pheasant
        being Present (that is, non-Viable and non-Functional) in all spatial units.
        The Cheer Pheasant has a Medium Conservation Legacy; without past conservation
        action, the Cheer Pheasant would have a score of 22%, as it is likely it would
        have gone extinct in one of its three spatial units. The species\u0026#39;
        Conservation Dependence and Conservation Gain are both Zero, as it is (respectively)
        unlikely that the species would go extinct in any spatial unit in the span
        of 10 years, even if all conservation stopped, and the species is likely to
        remain threatened in all spatial units over that time period even with continued
        conservation. Finally, within 100 years it would be possible for the Cheer
        Pheasant to become Functional in all spatial units, leading to a score of
        100%. Therefore, the Recovery Potential for the Cheer Pheasant is High.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFor
        additional data, see the \u003ca href=\u0026quot;https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/gss-supplementary\u0026quot;
        target=\u0026quot;_self\u0026quot;\u003eSupplementary Information\u003c/a\u003e
        document.\u003c/p\u003e","species_recovery_category":"Largely Depleted","species_recovery_score_best":"33%","species_recovery_score_minimum":"33%","species_recovery_score_maximum":"33%","conservation_legacy_category":"Medium","conservation_legacy_best":"11%","conservation_legacy_minimum":"0%","conservation_legacy_maximum":"22%","conservation_dependence_category":"Zero","conservation_dependence_best":"0%","conservation_dependence_minimum":"0%","conservation_dependence_maximum":"11%","conservation_gain_category":"Zero","conservation_gain_best":"0%","conservation_gain_minimum":"0%","conservation_gain_maximum":"67%","recovery_potential_category":"High","recovery_potential_best":"67%","recovery_potential_minimum":"22%","recovery_potential_maximum":"67%","assessor_names":"Gupta,
        G. \u0026 McGowan, P.J.K.","reviewer_names":"Kaul, R. \u0026 Grace, M.K.","contributors":null,"facilitators":"Grace,
        M.K.","compilers":null,"url":"https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/22679312/218835395","assessment_date":"2021-10-31","taxon":{"sis_id":22679312,"scientific_name":"Catreus
        wallichii","species_taxa":[],"subpopulation_taxa":[],"infrarank_taxa":[],"kingdom_name":"ANIMALIA","phylum_name":"CHORDATA","class_name":"AVES","order_name":"GALLIFORMES","family_name":"PHASIANIDAE","genus_name":"Catreus","species_name":"wallichii","subpopulation_name":null,"infra_name":null,"authority":"(Hardwicke,
        1827)","species":true,"subpopulation":false,"infrarank":false,"ssc_groups":[{"name":"IUCN
        SSC Bird Red List Authority (BirdLife International)","url":"https://www.birdlife.org/","description":"Red
        List Authority Coordinator: Ian Burfield (ian.burfield@birdlife.org)"}],"common_names":[{"main":false,"name":"Chir
        Pheasant","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Wallich''s
        Pheasant","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Faisán
        Chir","language":{"code":"spa","description":{"en":"Spanish; Castilian"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Faisán
        de Wallich","language":{"code":"spa","description":{"en":"Spanish; Castilian"}}},{"main":true,"name":"Cheer
        Pheasant","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}}],"synonyms":[{"name":"Catreus
        wallichii ssp. wallichii (Hardwicke, 1827) [orth. error] — Sibley and Monroe
        (1990, 1993)","status":"ACCEPTED","genus_name":"Catreus","species_name":"wallichii","species_author":null,"infrarank_author":"(Hardwicke,
        1827) [orth. error] — Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993)","subpopulation_name":null,"infra_type":"subspecies","infra_name":"wallichii"},{"name":"Catreus
        wallichi (Hardwicke, 1827) [orth. error]","status":"ACCEPTED","genus_name":"Catreus","species_name":"wallichi","species_author":"(Hardwicke,
        1827) [orth. error]","infrarank_author":null,"subpopulation_name":null,"infra_type":null,"infra_name":null},{"name":"Catreus
        wallichii ssp. wallichii (Hardwicke, 1827) [orth. error] — Collar and Andrew
        (1988)","status":"ACCEPTED","genus_name":"Catreus","species_name":"wallichii","species_author":null,"infrarank_author":"(Hardwicke,
        1827) [orth. error] — Collar and Andrew (1988)","subpopulation_name":null,"infra_type":"subspecies","infra_name":"wallichii"},{"name":"Lophophorus
        wallichii Hardwicke, 1827","status":"ACCEPTED","genus_name":"Lophophorus","species_name":"wallichii","species_author":"Hardwicke,
        1827","infrarank_author":null,"subpopulation_name":null,"infra_type":null,"infra_name":null}]}},{"assessment_year":"2021","weights":"Default","justification":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCavia
        intermedia\u003c/em\u003e evolved on, and has persisted on, a tiny island
        for around 8,000 years. Its Species Recovery Score of 33% (Largely Depleted)
        reflects the species\u0026#39; threatened status, rather than indicating a
        large decline from its historical state; in fact, the species is expected
        to occur in similar numbers today as it has for centuries. The island is difficult
        to access, and while some hunting may take place occasionally, it is unlikely
        to pose a major threat; therefore, past and planned conservation actions are
        minimal, and the species Conservation Legacy, Conservation Dependence, and
        Conservation Gain are all Zero. Nonetheless, there is a relatively high probability
        that a stochastic event (in this case, a fire) could drive the species to
        extinction within 20 years; therefore, all future scenarios include the possibility
        of extinction. Because the population currently fluctuates around carrying
        capacity, it is unlikely that the species could increase to much higher levels,
        but in the long term, if there was evidence that the species was not declining
        and that all non-stochastic threats were not operating, the species may yet
        be considered Fully Recovered. However, the threat of stochastic extinction
        makes the Recovery Potential for this species Indeterminate.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFor
        additional data, see the \u003ca href=\u0026quot;https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/gss-supplementary\u0026quot;
        target=\u0026quot;_self\u0026quot;\u003eSupplementary Information\u003c/a\u003e
        document.\u003c/p\u003e","species_recovery_category":"Largely Depleted","species_recovery_score_best":"33%","species_recovery_score_minimum":"33%","species_recovery_score_maximum":"33%","conservation_legacy_category":"Zero","conservation_legacy_best":"0%","conservation_legacy_minimum":"0%","conservation_legacy_maximum":"33%","conservation_dependence_category":"Zero","conservation_dependence_best":"0%","conservation_dependence_minimum":"0%","conservation_dependence_maximum":"33%","conservation_gain_category":"Zero","conservation_gain_best":"0%","conservation_gain_minimum":"-33%","conservation_gain_maximum":"0%","recovery_potential_category":"Indeterminate","recovery_potential_best":"0%","recovery_potential_minimum":"-33%","recovery_potential_maximum":"67%","assessor_names":"Salvador,
        C.H.","reviewer_names":"Lacher, T. \u0026 Grace, M.K.","contributors":null,"facilitators":"Grace,
        M.K.","compilers":null,"url":"https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/136520/22189125","assessment_date":"2021-10-31","taxon":{"sis_id":136520,"scientific_name":"Cavia
        intermedia","species_taxa":[],"subpopulation_taxa":[],"infrarank_taxa":[],"kingdom_name":"ANIMALIA","phylum_name":"CHORDATA","class_name":"MAMMALIA","order_name":"RODENTIA","family_name":"CAVIIDAE","genus_name":"Cavia","species_name":"intermedia","subpopulation_name":null,"infra_name":null,"authority":"Cherem,
        Olimpio \u0026amp; Ximenez, 1999","species":true,"subpopulation":false,"infrarank":false,"ssc_groups":[{"name":"IUCN
        SSC Small Mammal Specialist Group","url":"http://www.small-mammals.org/","description":"Co-Chairs:
        Thomas Lacher (email: tlacher@tamu.edu) and Rosalind Kennerley (email: Rosalind.Kennerley@durrell.org)\nRed
        List Authority Coordinator: Roslaind Kennedy (email: Rosalind.Kennerley@durrell.org)"}],"common_names":[{"main":false,"name":"Moleques
        do Sul Guinea Pig","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Santa-Catarina-Meerschweinchen","language":{"code":"ger","description":{"en":"German"}}},{"main":true,"name":"Santa
        Catarina’s Guinea Pig","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}}],"synonyms":[]}},{"assessment_year":"2021","weights":"Default","justification":"\u003cp\u003eThe
        Species Recovery Score of 67% (Moderately Depleted) is due to the Black Stork
        being Functional in one of its two spatial units, and Present in the other.
        The Black Stork has a Medium Conservation Legacy; without past conservation
        action, including protected areas, the Black Stork would have a score of 50%,
        as it is not likely the species would be Functional in any spatial unit. Its
        Conservation Dependence category is Zero; if conservation actions were to
        stop, it is expected that the species status would not change quickly enough
        to trigger a change in state over the next 10 years. The Black Stork has a
        Medium Conservation Gain; within a 10-year period, if conservation continues,
        it is expected that the currently Present spatial unit could become Viable,
        leading to a score of 83%. Finally, within 100 years it would be possible
        for The Black Stork to be Functional in all spatial units, leading to a score
        of 100%. Therefore, the Recovery Potential for The Black Stork is Medium (relative
        to its current score).\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFor additional data, see
        the \u003ca href=\u0026quot;https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/gss-supplementary\u0026quot;
        target=\u0026quot;_self\u0026quot;\u003eSupplementary Information\u003c/a\u003e
        document.\u003c/p\u003e","species_recovery_category":"Moderately Depleted","species_recovery_score_best":"67%","species_recovery_score_minimum":"67%","species_recovery_score_maximum":"83%","conservation_legacy_category":"Medium","conservation_legacy_best":"17%","conservation_legacy_minimum":"-17%","conservation_legacy_maximum":"33%","conservation_dependence_category":"Zero","conservation_dependence_best":"0%","conservation_dependence_minimum":"-17%","conservation_dependence_maximum":"33%","conservation_gain_category":"Medium","conservation_gain_best":"17%","conservation_gain_minimum":"-17%","conservation_gain_maximum":"33%","recovery_potential_category":"Medium","recovery_potential_best":"33%","recovery_potential_minimum":"0%","recovery_potential_maximum":"33%","assessor_names":"Cano-Alonso,
        L.S.","reviewer_names":"Hermes, C. \u0026 Grace, M.K.","contributors":null,"facilitators":"Grace,
        M.K.","compilers":null,"url":"https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/22697669/111747857","assessment_date":"2021-10-31","taxon":{"sis_id":22697669,"scientific_name":"Ciconia
        nigra","species_taxa":[],"subpopulation_taxa":[],"infrarank_taxa":[],"kingdom_name":"ANIMALIA","phylum_name":"CHORDATA","class_name":"AVES","order_name":"CICONIIFORMES","family_name":"CICONIIDAE","genus_name":"Ciconia","species_name":"nigra","subpopulation_name":null,"infra_name":null,"authority":"(Linnaeus,
        1758)","species":true,"subpopulation":false,"infrarank":false,"ssc_groups":[{"name":"IUCN
        SSC Bird Red List Authority (BirdLife International)","url":"https://www.birdlife.org/","description":"Red
        List Authority Coordinator: Ian Burfield (ian.burfield@birdlife.org)"}],"common_names":[{"main":false,"name":"Cigogne
        noire","language":{"code":"fre","description":{"en":"French"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Μαύρος
        Πελαργός","language":{"code":"gre","description":{"en":"Greek, Modern (1453-)"}}},{"main":true,"name":"Black
        Stork","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}}],"synonyms":[{"name":"Ardea
        nigra Linnaeus, 1758","status":"ACCEPTED","genus_name":"Ardea","species_name":"nigra","species_author":"Linnaeus,
        1758","infrarank_author":null,"subpopulation_name":null,"infra_type":null,"infra_name":null}]}},{"assessment_year":"2021","weights":"Default","justification":"\u003cp\u003eThe
        Species Recovery Score of 13% (Critically Depleted) is due to Philippine Crocodiles
        being Absent in 11/18 spatial units and only Present in the rest. Philippine
        Crocodiles have a High Conservation Legacy; without past conservation action,
        Philippine Crocodiles would only persist in three spatial units today. There
        is a High Conservation Dependence; if conservation actions were to stop, it
        is expected that the species would go extinct in all but one spatial unit
        over a 10-year period, bringing the score to 2%. Philippine Crocodiles have
        a High Conservation Gain; within a 10-year period, planned reintroductions
        and continued conservation could begin to achieve Viable spatial units, leading
        to a score of 26%. Finally, within 100 years it is unclear what could happen;
        the impacts of future habitat loss, dam building and climate change are uncertain.
        Therefore, the Recovery Potential for Philippine Crocodiles is Indeterminate.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFor
        additional data, see the \u003ca href=\u0026quot;https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/gss-supplementary\u0026quot;
        target=\u0026quot;_self\u0026quot;\u003eSupplementary Information\u003c/a\u003e
        document.\u003c/p\u003e","species_recovery_category":"Critically Depleted","species_recovery_score_best":"13%","species_recovery_score_minimum":"7%","species_recovery_score_maximum":"24%","conservation_legacy_category":"High","conservation_legacy_best":"7%","conservation_legacy_minimum":"-13%","conservation_legacy_maximum":"24%","conservation_dependence_category":"High","conservation_dependence_best":"11%","conservation_dependence_minimum":"-7%","conservation_dependence_maximum":"24%","conservation_gain_category":"High","conservation_gain_best":"13%","conservation_gain_minimum":"-15%","conservation_gain_maximum":"31%","recovery_potential_category":"Indeterminate","recovery_potential_best":"28%","recovery_potential_minimum":"-9%","recovery_potential_maximum":"46%","assessor_names":"van
        Weerd, M. \u0026 Gatan-Balbas, M.","reviewer_names":"Manolis, C., Hoffmann,
        M. \u0026 Grace, M.K.","contributors":null,"facilitators":"Grace, M.K.","compilers":null,"url":"https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/5672/3048281","assessment_date":"2021-10-31","taxon":{"sis_id":5672,"scientific_name":"Crocodylus
        mindorensis","species_taxa":[],"subpopulation_taxa":[],"infrarank_taxa":[],"kingdom_name":"ANIMALIA","phylum_name":"CHORDATA","class_name":"REPTILIA","order_name":"CROCODYLIA","family_name":"CROCODYLIDAE","genus_name":"Crocodylus","species_name":"mindorensis","subpopulation_name":null,"infra_name":null,"authority":"Schmidt,
        1935","species":true,"subpopulation":false,"infrarank":false,"ssc_groups":[{"name":"IUCN
        SSC Crocodile Specialist Group (crocodiles, alligators and caimans)","url":"http://www.iucncsg.org/","description":"Chair:
        Grahame Webb (email: gwebb@wmi.com.au)\nRed List Authority Coordinator: James
        Perran Ross (email: rossp@wec.ufl.edu)\nNewsletter: http://www.iucncsg.org/pages/Publications.html"}],"common_names":[{"main":false,"name":"Bukarot
        (N. Luzon)","language":{"code":"phi","description":{"en":"Philippine (Other)"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Buwaya","language":{"code":"tgl","description":{"en":"Tagalog"}}},{"main":true,"name":"Philippine
        Crocodile","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}}],"synonyms":[]}},{"assessment_year":"2021","weights":"Default","justification":"\u003cp\u003eThe
        Species Recovery Score of 11% (Critically Depleted) is due to the Jamaican
        Rock Iguana being found in only two of six spatial units today, and threatened
        in both. The Jamaican Rock Iguana has a High Conservation Legacy; without
        past conservation action, the Jamaican Rock Iguana would almost certainly
        be extinct today. There is a Low Conservation Dependence; if conservation
        actions were to stop, it is expected that one of the two remaining spatial
        units would be extirpated over a 10-year period, bringing the score to 6%.
        The Jamaican Rock Iguana has a High Conservation Gain; within a 10-year period,
        given planned reintroductions and invasive species control, it is expected
        that the species would become Viable in two spatial units and remain Present
        in a third, leading to a score of 28%. Finally, within 100 years it would
        be possible for the Jamaican Rock Iguana to become Viable or Functional over
        a substantial proportion of its indigenous range, leading to a score of 61%.
        Therefore, the Recovery Potential for the Jamaican Rock Iguana is High.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFor
        additional data, see the \u003ca href=\u0026quot;https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/gss-supplementary\u0026quot;
        target=\u0026quot;_self\u0026quot;\u003eSupplementary Information\u003c/a\u003e
        document.\u003c/p\u003e","species_recovery_category":"Critically Depleted","species_recovery_score_best":"11%","species_recovery_score_minimum":"6%","species_recovery_score_maximum":"11%","conservation_legacy_category":"High","conservation_legacy_best":"11%","conservation_legacy_minimum":"6%","conservation_legacy_maximum":"11%","conservation_dependence_category":"Low","conservation_dependence_best":"6%","conservation_dependence_minimum":"-6%","conservation_dependence_maximum":"6%","conservation_gain_category":"High","conservation_gain_best":"17%","conservation_gain_minimum":"11%","conservation_gain_maximum":"33%","recovery_potential_category":"High","recovery_potential_best":"50%","recovery_potential_minimum":"33%","recovery_potential_maximum":"61%","assessor_names":"Grant,
        T.D. \u0026 Pasachnik, S.A.","reviewer_names":"Hoffmann, M. \u0026 Grace,
        M.K.","contributors":null,"facilitators":"Grace, M.K.","compilers":"Wynter,
        V.","url":"https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/6027/206739532","assessment_date":"2021-10-31","taxon":{"sis_id":6027,"scientific_name":"Cyclura
        collei","species_taxa":[],"subpopulation_taxa":[],"infrarank_taxa":[],"kingdom_name":"ANIMALIA","phylum_name":"CHORDATA","class_name":"REPTILIA","order_name":"SQUAMATA","family_name":"IGUANIDAE","genus_name":"Cyclura","species_name":"collei","subpopulation_name":null,"infra_name":null,"authority":"Gray,
        1845","species":true,"subpopulation":false,"infrarank":false,"ssc_groups":[{"name":"IUCN
        SSC Iguana Specialist Group","url":"http://www.iucn-isg.org/","description":"Co-Chairs:
        Stesha Pasachnik (email: sapasachnik@gmail.com) and Charles Knapp (email:
        cknapp@sheddaquarium.org)\nRed List Authority Coordinator: Tandora Grant (email:
        tgrant@sandiegozoo.org)\nNewsletter: http://www.iucn-isg.org/publications/archive-newsletters/"}],"common_names":[{"main":false,"name":"Jamaican
        Ground Iguana","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Jamaican
        Iguana","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Cyclure
        terrestre de la Jamaïque","language":{"code":"fre","description":{"en":"French"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Iguane
        terrestre de la Jamaïque","language":{"code":"fre","description":{"en":"French"}}},{"main":true,"name":"Jamaican
        Rock Iguana","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}}],"synonyms":[]}},{"assessment_year":"2022","weights":"Default","justification":"\u003cp\u003eThe
        Mauritius Kestrel has a Species Recovery Score of 17% (Critically Depleted),
        primarily as a result of massive forest loss on Mauritius. However, without
        the reintroductions that have taken place, as well as provision of nest boxes
        and supplemental feeding, the species would almost certainly be extinct today
        (High Conservation Legacy). If these actions were to cease, then the species
        would decline over the next 10 years to a score of 10% (Low Conservation Dependence).
        Over that same time frame, the species is expected to remain stable with continued
        conservation (Zero Conservation Gain). In the long term, it will be possible
        to establish subpopulations in all remaining habitat, and even achieve some
        Functional subpopulations; however, the large-scale forest conversion limits
        the maximum predicted score that could be achieved over 100 years to 30% (Medium
        Recovery Potential).\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFor additional data, see the
        \u003ca href=\u0026quot;https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/gss-supplementary\u0026quot;
        target=\u0026quot;_self\u0026quot;\u003eSupplementary Information\u003c/a\u003e
        document.\u003c/p\u003e","species_recovery_category":"Critically Depleted","species_recovery_score_best":"17%","species_recovery_score_minimum":"17%","species_recovery_score_maximum":"27%","conservation_legacy_category":"High","conservation_legacy_best":"17%","conservation_legacy_minimum":"13%","conservation_legacy_maximum":"27%","conservation_dependence_category":"Low","conservation_dependence_best":"7%","conservation_dependence_minimum":"0%","conservation_dependence_maximum":"20%","conservation_gain_category":"Zero","conservation_gain_best":"0%","conservation_gain_minimum":"-10%","conservation_gain_maximum":"10%","recovery_potential_category":"Medium","recovery_potential_best":"13%","recovery_potential_minimum":"-3%","recovery_potential_maximum":"20%","assessor_names":"Tatayah,
        V.","reviewer_names":"Nicoll, M. \u0026 Grace, M.K.","contributors":null,"facilitators":"Grace,
        M.K. \u0026 Young, R.E.","compilers":null,"url":"https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/22696373/226885309","assessment_date":"2022-07-21","taxon":{"sis_id":22696373,"scientific_name":"Falco
        punctatus","species_taxa":[],"subpopulation_taxa":[],"infrarank_taxa":[],"kingdom_name":"ANIMALIA","phylum_name":"CHORDATA","class_name":"AVES","order_name":"FALCONIFORMES","family_name":"FALCONIDAE","genus_name":"Falco","species_name":"punctatus","subpopulation_name":null,"infra_name":null,"authority":"Temminck,
        1821","species":true,"subpopulation":false,"infrarank":false,"ssc_groups":[{"name":"IUCN
        SSC Bird Red List Authority (BirdLife International)","url":"https://www.birdlife.org/","description":"Red
        List Authority Coordinator: Ian Burfield (ian.burfield@birdlife.org)"}],"common_names":[{"main":false,"name":"Cernícalo
        de la Mauricio","language":{"code":"spa","description":{"en":"Spanish; Castilian"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Crécerelle
        de l''Ile Maurice","language":{"code":"fre","description":{"en":"French"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Crécerelle
        de Maurice","language":{"code":"fre","description":{"en":"French"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Faucon
        de l''Ile Maurice","language":{"code":"fre","description":{"en":"French"}}},{"main":true,"name":"Mauritius
        Kestrel","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}}],"synonyms":[]}},{"assessment_year":"2021","weights":"Default","justification":"\u003cp\u003eThe
        Species Recovery Score of 17% (Critically Depleted) is due to the Northern
        Sportive Lemur being Absent in one of its two spatial units, and highly threatened
        (Present) in the other due to habitat loss for charcoal production and hunting.
        The Northern Sportive Lemur has a High Conservation Legacy; without past conservation
        action, especially the establishment of the Montagne des Fran\u0026ccedil;ais
        protected area, the Northern Sportive Lemur would almost certainly be extinct
        today. There is a High Conservation Dependence; if protections were to stop,
        it is expected that the species would be driven to extinction within 10 years.
        The Northern Sportive Lemur has a High Conservation Gain; within a 10-year
        period, if the planned actions of forest restoration, reforestation and monitoring
        are carried out as planned, it is expected that the species may go from Present
        to Viable in its extant spatial unit, leading to a score of 33%. Finally,
        within 100 years it would be possible for the Northern Sportive Lemur to be
        reintroduced to its second spatial unit, and even become Functional in both
        as a result of reforestation and habitat restoration, as well as enforcement
        of protected area laws and a reduction in charcoal production, leading to
        a score of 100%. Therefore, the Recovery Potential for the Northern Sportive
        Lemur is High. However, while this recovery is biologically and ecologically
        possible, it will require a large-scale coordinated effort.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFor
        additional data, see the \u003ca href=\u0026quot;https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/gss-supplementary\u0026quot;
        target=\u0026quot;_self\u0026quot;\u003eSupplementary Information\u003c/a\u003e
        document.\u003c/p\u003e","species_recovery_category":"Critically Depleted","species_recovery_score_best":"17%","species_recovery_score_minimum":"17%","species_recovery_score_maximum":"17%","conservation_legacy_category":"High","conservation_legacy_best":"17%","conservation_legacy_minimum":"17%","conservation_legacy_maximum":"17%","conservation_dependence_category":"High","conservation_dependence_best":"17%","conservation_dependence_minimum":"17%","conservation_dependence_maximum":"17%","conservation_gain_category":"High","conservation_gain_best":"17%","conservation_gain_minimum":"0%","conservation_gain_maximum":"33%","recovery_potential_category":"High","recovery_potential_best":"83%","recovery_potential_minimum":"67%","recovery_potential_maximum":"83%","assessor_names":"Louis
        Jr, E.E. \u0026 Stephenson, P.J.","reviewer_names":"Schwitzer, C. \u0026 Grace,
        M.K.","contributors":null,"facilitators":"Grace, M.K.","compilers":null,"url":"https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/11622/115567059","assessment_date":"2021-10-31","taxon":{"sis_id":11622,"scientific_name":"Lepilemur
        septentrionalis","species_taxa":[],"subpopulation_taxa":[],"infrarank_taxa":[],"kingdom_name":"ANIMALIA","phylum_name":"CHORDATA","class_name":"MAMMALIA","order_name":"PRIMATES","family_name":"LEPILEMURIDAE","genus_name":"Lepilemur","species_name":"septentrionalis","subpopulation_name":null,"infra_name":null,"authority":"Rumpler
        \u0026amp; Albignac, 1975","species":true,"subpopulation":false,"infrarank":false,"ssc_groups":[{"name":"IUCN
        SSC Primate Specialist Group","url":"http://www.primate-sg.org/","description":"Chair:
        Russell Mittermeier (email: rmittermeier@globalwildlife.org)\nRed List Authority
        Focal Points: \nProsimians, monkeys and smaller apes - Sanjay Molur (email:
        sanjay@zooreach.org) and Christoph Schwitzer (email: cschwitzer@bristolzoo.org.uk)\nVice-Chair
        for great apes - Dirck S. Byler (email: dbyler@globalwildlife.org)\nVice-Chair
        for small apes - Susan M. Cheyne (email: section.small.apes@gmail.com)\nJournals
        and Newsletters: \nPrimate Conservation: http://www.primate-sg.org/primate_conservation/\nNeotropical
        Primates: http://www.primate-sg.org/neotropical_primates/\nAsian Primates:
        http://www.primate-sg.org/asian_primates_newsletter/ and http://www.primate-sg.org/asian_primates_journal/\nLemur
        News: http://www.primate-sg.org/lemur_news/\nAfrican Primates: http://www.primate-sg.org/african_primates/\n"}],"common_names":[{"main":false,"name":"Northern
        Sportive Lemur","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Lemur
        Comadreja Septentrional","language":{"code":"spa","description":{"en":"Spanish;
        Castilian"}}},{"main":true,"name":"Sahafary Sportive Lemur","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}}],"synonyms":[]}},{"assessment_year":"2022","weights":"Default","justification":"\u003cp\u003eThe
        Himalayan Monal has a Species Recovery Score of 58% (Moderately Depleted)
        because it is declining across its range, leaving it Viable in three spatial
        units and Present in the fourth. Nonetheless, there is a Medium Conservation
        Legacy; without the existence of protected areas, it is expected that the
        species would only be Viable in one spatial unit today, bringing the score
        to 42%. The species\u0026#39; Conservation Gain is Indeterminate, but it has
        a Medium Conservation Dependence: if protected areas were to be degazetted,
        the species is expected to reduce its score to 42% within 10 years. Finally,
        it would be feasible, with sustained and heightened conservation efforts,
        to restore the species to functionality across its range (a score of 100%).
        This gives the species a High Recovery Potential.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFor
        additional data, see the \u003ca href=\u0026quot;https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/gss-supplementary\u0026quot;
        target=\u0026quot;_self\u0026quot;\u003eSupplementary Information\u003c/a\u003e
        document.\u003c/p\u003e","species_recovery_category":"Moderately Depleted","species_recovery_score_best":"58%","species_recovery_score_minimum":"50%","species_recovery_score_maximum":"83%","conservation_legacy_category":"Medium","conservation_legacy_best":"17%","conservation_legacy_minimum":"0%","conservation_legacy_maximum":"50%","conservation_dependence_category":"Medium","conservation_dependence_best":"17%","conservation_dependence_minimum":"8%","conservation_dependence_maximum":"50%","conservation_gain_category":"Indeterminate","conservation_gain_best":"8%","conservation_gain_minimum":"-17%","conservation_gain_maximum":"50%","recovery_potential_category":"High","recovery_potential_best":"42%","recovery_potential_minimum":"17%","recovery_potential_maximum":"50%","assessor_names":"Gupta,
        G. \u0026 McGowan, P.","reviewer_names":"Dowell, S. \u0026 Grace, M.K.","contributors":null,"facilitators":"Grace,
        M.K. \u0026 Young, R.E.","compilers":null,"url":"https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/22679182/92806166","assessment_date":"2022-07-21","taxon":{"sis_id":22679182,"scientific_name":"Lophophorus
        impejanus","species_taxa":[],"subpopulation_taxa":[],"infrarank_taxa":[],"kingdom_name":"ANIMALIA","phylum_name":"CHORDATA","class_name":"AVES","order_name":"GALLIFORMES","family_name":"PHASIANIDAE","genus_name":"Lophophorus","species_name":"impejanus","subpopulation_name":null,"infra_name":null,"authority":"(Latham,
        1790)","species":true,"subpopulation":false,"infrarank":false,"ssc_groups":[{"name":"IUCN
        SSC Bird Red List Authority (BirdLife International)","url":"https://www.birdlife.org/","description":"Red
        List Authority Coordinator: Ian Burfield (ian.burfield@birdlife.org)"}],"common_names":[{"main":true,"name":"Himalayan
        Monal","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}}],"synonyms":[]}},{"assessment_year":"2021","weights":"Default","justification":"\u003cp\u003eThe
        Eurasian Otter\u0026#39;s Species Recovery Score of 40% (Largely Depleted)
        is due to large declines since the 1950s as a result of hunting and habitat
        loss. The Eurasian Otter has an Indeterminate Conservation Legacy, meaning
        that it is difficult to measure the impact of past conservation; however,
        the best estimate this that legal protection has resulted in a higher score
        today than it would have had otherwise. There is also Indeterminate Conservation
        Dependence, meaning it is unclear how the score would change over the next
        10 years if conservation stopped. However, the Eurasian Otter has a Low Conservation
        Gain; within a 10-year period, if conservation continues as planned, it is
        expected that the species\u0026#39; score could increase from 40% to 54%.
        Finally, within 100 years, the Recovery Potential is also Indeterminate, as
        climate change is predicted to increase available habitat in some areas and
        decrease it in others.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFor additional data, see
        the \u003ca href=\u0026quot;https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/gss-supplementary\u0026quot;
        target=\u0026quot;_self\u0026quot;\u003eSupplementary Information\u003c/a\u003e
        document.\u003c/p\u003e","species_recovery_category":"Largely Depleted","species_recovery_score_best":"40%","species_recovery_score_minimum":"28%","species_recovery_score_maximum":"55%","conservation_legacy_category":"Indeterminate","conservation_legacy_best":"21%","conservation_legacy_minimum":"-15%","conservation_legacy_maximum":"47%","conservation_dependence_category":"Indeterminate","conservation_dependence_best":"15%","conservation_dependence_minimum":"-14%","conservation_dependence_maximum":"45%","conservation_gain_category":"Low","conservation_gain_best":"3%","conservation_gain_minimum":"-25%","conservation_gain_maximum":"33%","recovery_potential_category":"Indeterminate","recovery_potential_best":"14%","recovery_potential_minimum":"-23%","recovery_potential_maximum":"44%","assessor_names":"Loy,
        A., Jamwal, P.S. \u0026 Hussain, S.A.","reviewer_names":"Grace, M.K. \u0026
        Rheingantz, M.L.","contributors":"Oleynikov, A., Djurovic, N., Al-Sheikhly,
        O.F., Chan, B., Sasaki, H., van Dijk, J., Weinberger, I., Hong, S., Li, F.,
        Aadrean, A. \u0026 Savage, M.","facilitators":"Grace, M.K.","compilers":null,"url":"https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/12419/218069689","assessment_date":"2021-10-31","taxon":{"sis_id":12419,"scientific_name":"Lutra
        lutra","species_taxa":[],"subpopulation_taxa":[],"infrarank_taxa":[],"kingdom_name":"ANIMALIA","phylum_name":"CHORDATA","class_name":"MAMMALIA","order_name":"CARNIVORA","family_name":"MUSTELIDAE","genus_name":"Lutra","species_name":"lutra","subpopulation_name":null,"infra_name":null,"authority":"(Linnaeus,
        1758)","species":true,"subpopulation":false,"infrarank":false,"ssc_groups":[{"name":"IUCN
        SSC Otter Specialist Group","url":"http://www.otterspecialistgroup.org/","description":"Co-Chairs:
        Nicole Duplaix (email: Nicole.Duplaix@oregonstate.edu) and Anna Loy (email:
        a.loy@unimol.it)\nRed List Authority Coordinator: Syed Ainul Hussain (email:
        hussain@wii.gov.in)\nNewsletter: http://www.otterspecialistgroup.org/Bulletin/IUCNOSGBull.html"}],"common_names":[{"main":false,"name":"Common
        Otter","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}},{"main":false,"name":"European
        Otter","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}},{"main":false,"name":"European
        River Otter","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Old
        World Otter","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Fischotter","language":{"code":"ger","description":{"en":"German"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Loutre
        commune","language":{"code":"fre","description":{"en":"French"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Loutre
        de rivière","language":{"code":"fre","description":{"en":"French"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Loutre
        d''Europe","language":{"code":"fre","description":{"en":"French"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Nutria","language":{"code":"spa","description":{"en":"Spanish;
        Castilian"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Nutria Común","language":{"code":"spa","description":{"en":"Spanish;
        Castilian"}}},{"main":false,"name":"видра","language":{"code":"mac","description":{"en":"Macedonian"}}},{"main":true,"name":"Eurasian
        Otter","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}}],"synonyms":[{"name":"Lutra
        nippon Imaizumi \u0026 Yoshiyuki, 1989","status":"ADDED","genus_name":"Lutra","species_name":"nippon","species_author":"Imaizumi
        \u0026 Yoshiyuki, 1989","infrarank_author":null,"subpopulation_name":null,"infra_type":null,"infra_name":null},{"name":"Viverra
        lutra Linnaeus, 1758","status":"ACCEPTED","genus_name":"Viverra","species_name":"lutra","species_author":"Linnaeus,
        1758","infrarank_author":null,"subpopulation_name":null,"infra_type":null,"infra_name":null}]}},{"assessment_year":"2021","weights":"Default","justification":"\u003cp\u003eThe
        Giant River Prawn has a Species Recovery Score of 100% (Non-Depleted) as it
        is a common species whose distribution and abundance are not assessed to have
        been significantly impacted by humans, despite its commercial use. No conservation
        actions have been taken for this species, and none are planned at this time,
        so the four Conservation Impact Metrics (Conservation Legacy, Conservation
        Dependence, Conservation Gain, and Recovery Potential) are all Zero.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFor
        additional data, see the \u003ca href=\u0026quot;https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/gss-supplementary\u0026quot;
        target=\u0026quot;_self\u0026quot;\u003eSupplementary Information\u003c/a\u003e
        document.\u003c/p\u003e","species_recovery_category":"Non-Depleted","species_recovery_score_best":"100%","species_recovery_score_minimum":"100%","species_recovery_score_maximum":"100%","conservation_legacy_category":"Zero","conservation_legacy_best":"0%","conservation_legacy_minimum":"0%","conservation_legacy_maximum":"0%","conservation_dependence_category":"Zero","conservation_dependence_best":"0%","conservation_dependence_minimum":"0%","conservation_dependence_maximum":"0%","conservation_gain_category":"Zero","conservation_gain_best":"0%","conservation_gain_minimum":"0%","conservation_gain_maximum":"0%","recovery_potential_category":"Zero","recovery_potential_best":"0%","recovery_potential_minimum":"-33%","recovery_potential_maximum":"0%","assessor_names":"Niloy,
        M.N.H. \u0026 Chowdhury, G.H.","reviewer_names":"Grace, M.K.","contributors":null,"facilitators":"Grace,
        M.K.","compilers":null,"url":"https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/197873/2503520","assessment_date":"2021-10-31","taxon":{"sis_id":197873,"scientific_name":"Macrobrachium
        rosenbergii","species_taxa":[],"subpopulation_taxa":[],"infrarank_taxa":[],"kingdom_name":"ANIMALIA","phylum_name":"ARTHROPODA","class_name":"MALACOSTRACA","order_name":"DECAPODA","family_name":"PALAEMONIDAE","genus_name":"Macrobrachium","species_name":"rosenbergii","subpopulation_name":null,"infra_name":null,"authority":"(De
        Man, 1879)","species":true,"subpopulation":false,"infrarank":false,"ssc_groups":[],"common_names":[{"main":false,"name":"Giant
        Freshwater Prawn","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}},{"main":true,"name":"Giant
        River Prawn","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}}],"synonyms":[{"name":"Palaemon
        rosenbergii De Man, 1879","status":"ACCEPTED","genus_name":"Palaemon","species_name":"rosenbergii","species_author":"De
        Man, 1879","infrarank_author":null,"subpopulation_name":null,"infra_type":null,"infra_name":null}]}},{"assessment_year":"2021","weights":"Default","justification":"\u003cp\u003eThe
        Species Recovery Score of 17% (Critically Depleted) is due to massive forest
        loss across the Pink Pigeon\u0026#39;s indigenous range. The Pink Pigeon has
        a High Conservation Legacy; without past conservation action, Pink Pigeons
        would almost certainly be extinct today. There is a Low Conservation Dependence;
        if conservation actions were to stop, it is expected that loss of restored
        ecological functionality would occur over a 10-year period, bringing the score
        to 12%. The Pink Pigeon has a Low Conservation Gain; within a 10-year period,
        it is expected that the scope of threats facing the species will allow for
        only modest progress over that time scale (leading to a score of 21%). Finally,
        within 100 years it would be possible for Pink Pigeon to achieve ecological
        functionality in many of the spatial units where suitable habitat remains
        or could be restored, leading to a score of 44%. Therefore, the Recovery Potential
        for Pink Pigeon is Medium.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFor additional data,
        see the \u003ca href=\u0026quot;https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/gss-supplementary\u0026quot;
        target=\u0026quot;_self\u0026quot;\u003eSupplementary Information\u003c/a\u003e
        document.\u003c/p\u003e","species_recovery_category":"Critically Depleted","species_recovery_score_best":"17%","species_recovery_score_minimum":"17%","species_recovery_score_maximum":"17%","conservation_legacy_category":"High","conservation_legacy_best":"17%","conservation_legacy_minimum":"14%","conservation_legacy_maximum":"17%","conservation_dependence_category":"Low","conservation_dependence_best":"5%","conservation_dependence_minimum":"5%","conservation_dependence_maximum":"8%","conservation_gain_category":"Low","conservation_gain_best":"5%","conservation_gain_minimum":"0%","conservation_gain_maximum":"17%","recovery_potential_category":"Medium","recovery_potential_best":"27%","recovery_potential_minimum":"15%","recovery_potential_maximum":"36%","assessor_names":"Tatayah,
        V.","reviewer_names":"Hermes, C. \u0026 Grace, M.K.","contributors":null,"facilitators":"Grace,
        M.K.","compilers":null,"url":"https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/22690392/179390191","assessment_date":"2021-10-31","taxon":{"sis_id":22690392,"scientific_name":"Nesoenas
        mayeri","species_taxa":[],"subpopulation_taxa":[],"infrarank_taxa":[],"kingdom_name":"ANIMALIA","phylum_name":"CHORDATA","class_name":"AVES","order_name":"COLUMBIFORMES","family_name":"COLUMBIDAE","genus_name":"Nesoenas","species_name":"mayeri","subpopulation_name":null,"infra_name":null,"authority":"(Prévost,
        1843)","species":true,"subpopulation":false,"infrarank":false,"ssc_groups":[{"name":"IUCN
        SSC Bird Red List Authority (BirdLife International)","url":"https://www.birdlife.org/","description":"Red
        List Authority Coordinator: Ian Burfield (ian.burfield@birdlife.org)"}],"common_names":[{"main":false,"name":"Paloma
        de Mauricio","language":{"code":"spa","description":{"en":"Spanish; Castilian"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Pigeon
        rose","language":{"code":"fre","description":{"en":"French"}}},{"main":true,"name":"Pink
        Pigeon","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}}],"synonyms":[{"name":"Columba
        mayeri ssp. mayeri Prévost, 1843 — Collar \u003ci\u003eet al\u003c/i\u003e.
        (1994)","status":"ACCEPTED","genus_name":"Columba","species_name":"mayeri","species_author":null,"infrarank_author":"Prévost,
        1843 — Collar \u003ci\u003eet al\u003c/i\u003e. (1994)","subpopulation_name":null,"infra_type":"subspecies","infra_name":"mayeri"},{"name":"Streptopelia
        mayeri (Prévost, 1843) — BirdLife International (2004)","status":"ACCEPTED","genus_name":"Streptopelia","species_name":"mayeri","species_author":"(Prévost,
        1843) — BirdLife International (2004)","infrarank_author":null,"subpopulation_name":null,"infra_type":null,"infra_name":null},{"name":"Columba
        mayeri ssp. mayeri Prévost, 1843 — Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993)","status":"ACCEPTED","genus_name":"Columba","species_name":"mayeri","species_author":null,"infrarank_author":"Prévost,
        1843 — Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993)","subpopulation_name":null,"infra_type":"subspecies","infra_name":"mayeri"},{"name":"Columba
        mayeri ssp. mayeri Prévost, 1843 — BirdLife International (2000)","status":"ACCEPTED","genus_name":"Columba","species_name":"mayeri","species_author":null,"infrarank_author":"Prévost,
        1843 — BirdLife International (2000)","subpopulation_name":null,"infra_type":"subspecies","infra_name":"mayeri"},{"name":"Columba
        mayeri Prévost, 1843","status":"ACCEPTED","genus_name":"Columba","species_name":"mayeri","species_author":"Prévost,
        1843","infrarank_author":null,"subpopulation_name":null,"infra_type":null,"infra_name":null}]}},{"assessment_year":"2021","weights":"Default","justification":"\u003cp\u003eThe
        Banded Wobbegong\u0026#39;s Species Recovery Score of 100% (Fully Recovered)
        is due to the introduction of fishing restrictions in spatial units where
        it was previously threatened. The Banded Wobbegong has a Medium Conservation
        Legacy; if not for the implementation of fishing regulations, the species
        would likely still be threatened in two of its four spatial units. There is
        also a Medium Conservation Dependence; if conservation actions were to stop,
        it is expected that the species could become non-functional in these spatial
        units over a 10-year period, bringing the score to 83%. The Banded Wobbegong
        has a Conservation Gain of Zero; the species is already considered Fully Recovered.
        Finally, over the next 100 years this success is expected to continue and
        climate change is not considered a threat to this species, making the Recovery
        Potential for the Banded Wobbegong also Zero.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFor
        additional data, see the \u003ca href=\u0026quot;https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/gss-supplementary\u0026quot;
        target=\u0026quot;_self\u0026quot;\u003eSupplementary Information\u003c/a\u003e
        document.\u003c/p\u003e","species_recovery_category":"Fully Recovered","species_recovery_score_best":"100%","species_recovery_score_minimum":"67%","species_recovery_score_maximum":"100%","conservation_legacy_category":"Medium","conservation_legacy_best":"33%","conservation_legacy_minimum":"0%","conservation_legacy_maximum":"50%","conservation_dependence_category":"Medium","conservation_dependence_best":"17%","conservation_dependence_minimum":"-33%","conservation_dependence_maximum":"33%","conservation_gain_category":"Zero","conservation_gain_best":"0%","conservation_gain_minimum":"-17%","conservation_gain_maximum":"33%","recovery_potential_category":"Zero","recovery_potential_best":"0%","recovery_potential_minimum":"-17%","recovery_potential_maximum":"33%","assessor_names":"Huveneers,
        C.","reviewer_names":"Rigby, C.L., Pierce, S.J., Perez Jimenez, J.C., Ak\u0026ccedil;akaya,
        H.R. \u0026 Grace, M.K.","contributors":null,"facilitators":"Grace, M.K.","compilers":"Wynter,
        V.","url":"https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/161709/68638176","assessment_date":"2021-10-31","taxon":{"sis_id":161709,"scientific_name":"Orectolobus
        halei","species_taxa":[],"subpopulation_taxa":[],"infrarank_taxa":[],"kingdom_name":"ANIMALIA","phylum_name":"CHORDATA","class_name":"CHONDRICHTHYES","order_name":"ORECTOLOBIFORMES","family_name":"ORECTOLOBIDAE","genus_name":"Orectolobus","species_name":"halei","subpopulation_name":null,"infra_name":null,"authority":"Whitley,
        1940","species":true,"subpopulation":false,"infrarank":false,"ssc_groups":[{"name":"IUCN
        SSC Shark Specialist Group (sharks and rays)","url":"https://www.iucnssg.org","description":"Chair:
        Rima Jabado (email: rimajabado@hotmail.com)\nRed List Authority Coordinator:
        Cassie Rigby (email: crigby@westnet.com.au)"}],"common_names":[{"main":false,"name":"Gulf
        Wobbegong","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Large
        Ornate Wobbegong","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}},{"main":true,"name":"Banded
        Wobbegong","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}}],"synonyms":[{"name":"Orectolobus
        ornatus ssp. halei Whitley, 1940","status":"ACCEPTED","genus_name":"Orectolobus","species_name":"ornatus","species_author":null,"infrarank_author":"Whitley,
        1940","subpopulation_name":null,"infra_type":"subspecies","infra_name":"halei"},{"name":"Orectolobus
        devisi Ogilby, 1916","status":"ACCEPTED","genus_name":"Orectolobus","species_name":"devisi","species_author":"Ogilby,
        1916","infrarank_author":null,"subpopulation_name":null,"infra_type":null,"infra_name":null}]}},{"assessment_year":"2021","weights":"Fine-resolution","justification":"\u003cp\u003eThe
        Whale Shark\u0026#39;s Species Recovery Score of 29% (Largely Depleted) is
        due to the species being threatened across its range because of declines in
        abundance. The Whale Shark has a Low Conservation Legacy; without past conservation
        action, the Whale Shark would have a score of 25%, as it is expected that
        the closure of some targeted fisheries in two spatial units helped reduce
        the species\u0026#39; decline there. There is a Low Conservation Dependence;
        if conservation actions were to stop, it is expected that resumed high levels
        of bycatch could become an issue in one spatial unit over a 10-year period,
        bringing the score to 27%. The Whale Shark has a Medium Conservation Gain;
        the species has a long generation time, limiting the speed at which it can
        show recovery, but within a 10-year period it is expected that a reduction
        in targeted fishing, and bycatch mitigation in gillnet and purse-seine fisheries,
        will allow populations to stabilize, albeit at a low level, leading to a score
        of 55%. Finally, within 100 years it would be possible for The Whale Shark
        to Fully Recover; climate shifts, and potential effects on plankton productivity,
        are not expected to limit Whale Shark habitat availability. Therefore, the
        Recovery Potential for The Whale Shark is High, but achieving this will required
        concerted and sustained effort.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFor additional
        data, see the \u003ca href=\u0026quot;https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/gss-supplementary\u0026quot;
        target=\u0026quot;_self\u0026quot;\u003eSupplementary Information\u003c/a\u003e
        document.\u003c/p\u003e","species_recovery_category":"Largely Depleted","species_recovery_score_best":"29%","species_recovery_score_minimum":"25%","species_recovery_score_maximum":"55%","conservation_legacy_category":"Low","conservation_legacy_best":"4%","conservation_legacy_minimum":"-6%","conservation_legacy_maximum":"32%","conservation_dependence_category":"Low","conservation_dependence_best":"2%","conservation_dependence_minimum":"-8%","conservation_dependence_maximum":"30%","conservation_gain_category":"Medium","conservation_gain_best":"26%","conservation_gain_minimum":"-26%","conservation_gain_maximum":"32%","recovery_potential_category":"High","recovery_potential_best":"71%","recovery_potential_minimum":"45%","recovery_potential_maximum":"75%","assessor_names":"Pierce,
        S.J., Grace, M.K. \u0026 Araujo, G.","reviewer_names":"Rigby, C.L, Spaet,
        J.L.Y \u0026 Hoffmann, M.","contributors":null,"facilitators":"Grace, M.K.","compilers":"Wynter,
        V.","url":"https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/19488/2365291","assessment_date":"2021-10-31","taxon":{"sis_id":19488,"scientific_name":"Rhincodon
        typus","species_taxa":[],"subpopulation_taxa":[{"sis_id":126671962,"scientific_name":"Rhincodon
        typus Atlantic Subpopulation","kingdom_name":"ANIMALIA","phylum_name":"CHORDATA","class_name":"CHONDRICHTHYES","order_name":"ORECTOLOBIFORMES","family_name":"RHINCODONTIDAE","genus_name":"Rhincodon","species_name":"typus","subpopulation_name":"Atlantic
        Subpopulation","infra_name":null,"authority":"Smith, 1828","ssc_groups":[{"name":"IUCN
        SSC Shark Specialist Group (sharks and rays)","url":"https://www.iucnssg.org","description":"Chair:
        Rima Jabado (email: rimajabado@hotmail.com)\nRed List Authority Coordinator:
        Cassie Rigby (email: crigby@westnet.com.au)"}],"common_names":[],"synonyms":[]},{"sis_id":126671910,"scientific_name":"Rhincodon
        typus Indo-Pacific Subpopulation","kingdom_name":"ANIMALIA","phylum_name":"CHORDATA","class_name":"CHONDRICHTHYES","order_name":"ORECTOLOBIFORMES","family_name":"RHINCODONTIDAE","genus_name":"Rhincodon","species_name":"typus","subpopulation_name":"Indo-Pacific
        Subpopulation","infra_name":null,"authority":"Smith, 1828","ssc_groups":[{"name":"IUCN
        SSC Shark Specialist Group (sharks and rays)","url":"https://www.iucnssg.org","description":"Chair:
        Rima Jabado (email: rimajabado@hotmail.com)\nRed List Authority Coordinator:
        Cassie Rigby (email: crigby@westnet.com.au)"}],"common_names":[],"synonyms":[]}],"infrarank_taxa":[],"kingdom_name":"ANIMALIA","phylum_name":"CHORDATA","class_name":"CHONDRICHTHYES","order_name":"ORECTOLOBIFORMES","family_name":"RHINCODONTIDAE","genus_name":"Rhincodon","species_name":"typus","subpopulation_name":null,"infra_name":null,"authority":"Smith,
        1828","species":true,"subpopulation":false,"infrarank":false,"ssc_groups":[{"name":"IUCN
        SSC Shark Specialist Group (sharks and rays)","url":"https://www.iucnssg.org","description":"Chair:
        Rima Jabado (email: rimajabado@hotmail.com)\nRed List Authority Coordinator:
        Cassie Rigby (email: crigby@westnet.com.au)"}],"common_names":[{"main":false,"name":"Requin
        baleine","language":{"code":"fre","description":{"en":"French"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Tiburón
        Ballena","language":{"code":"spa","description":{"en":"Spanish; Castilian"}}},{"main":false,"name":"القرش
        الحوت","language":{"code":"ara","description":{"en":"Arabic"}}},{"main":true,"name":"Whale
        Shark","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}}],"synonyms":[]}},{"assessment_year":"2021","weights":"Default","justification":"\u003cp\u003eThe
        Sardinian Currant\u0026#39;s Species Recovery Score of 33% (Largely Depleted)
        is due to the fact that this species, which has only ever existed in one spatial
        unit, is not currently Viable. The Sardinian Currant has a Conservation Legacy
        and Conservation Gain of Zero; past attempts to bolster the wild population
        with individuals from \u003cem\u003eex situ\u003c/em\u003e populations have
        not been successful, and while attempts continue, it is unclear whether they
        will be able to restore a Viable population within 10 years, given ongoing
        threats from human disturbance and grazing animals. Given these threats, there
        is a High Conservation Dependence; if conservation actions were to stop, it
        is expected that the species would likely go extinct over a 10-year period.
        Finally, with effective protection and successful translocations, within 100
        years it would be possible for the Sardinian Currant to become Fully Recovered.
        However, this future is uncertain, especially because the relict population
        is vulnerable to extinction via stochastic events, which are expected to increase
        in frequency with climate change. Therefore, the Recovery Potential for Sardinian
        Currant is Indeterminate.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFor additional data,
        see the \u003ca href=\u0026quot;https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/gss-supplementary\u0026quot;
        target=\u0026quot;_self\u0026quot;\u003eSupplementary Information\u003c/a\u003e
        document.\u003c/p\u003e","species_recovery_category":"Largely Depleted","species_recovery_score_best":"33%","species_recovery_score_minimum":"33%","species_recovery_score_maximum":"33%","conservation_legacy_category":"Zero","conservation_legacy_best":"0%","conservation_legacy_minimum":"0%","conservation_legacy_maximum":"0%","conservation_dependence_category":"High","conservation_dependence_best":"33%","conservation_dependence_minimum":"0%","conservation_dependence_maximum":"33%","conservation_gain_category":"Zero","conservation_gain_best":"0%","conservation_gain_minimum":"0%","conservation_gain_maximum":"0%","recovery_potential_category":"Indeterminate","recovery_potential_best":"0%","recovery_potential_minimum":"-33%","recovery_potential_maximum":"67%","assessor_names":"Fenu,
        G., Cogoni, D. \u0026 Bacchetta, G.","reviewer_names":"Montagnani, C. \u0026
        Grace, M.K.","contributors":null,"facilitators":"Grace, M.K.","compilers":null,"url":"https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/61675/102933336","assessment_date":"2021-10-31","taxon":{"sis_id":61675,"scientific_name":"Ribes
        sardoum","species_taxa":[],"subpopulation_taxa":[],"infrarank_taxa":[],"kingdom_name":"PLANTAE","phylum_name":"TRACHEOPHYTA","class_name":"MAGNOLIOPSIDA","order_name":"SAXIFRAGALES","family_name":"GROSSULARIACEAE","genus_name":"Ribes","species_name":"sardoum","subpopulation_name":null,"infra_name":null,"authority":"Martelli","species":true,"subpopulation":false,"infrarank":false,"ssc_groups":[],"common_names":[{"main":true,"name":"Sardinian
        Currant","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}}],"synonyms":[]}},{"assessment_year":"2021","weights":"Default","justification":"\u003cp\u003eThe
        Bonnethead Shark\u0026#39;s Species Recovery Score of 44% (Largely Depleted)
        reflects that while the species is Viable in one of its three spatial units,
        it is not ecologically Functional; in the other two spatial units, the species
        is threatened and therefore Present (not Viable). The Bonnethead Shark has
        a High Conservation Legacy; without past fisheries management, the Bonnethead
        Shark would have a score of 11%, due to expected extirpation in two spatial
        units and loss of viability in the third. There is a High Conservation Dependence;
        if management were to stop, it is expected that within a 10-year period, the
        score could drop to 11%. The Bonnethead Shark has a Medium Conservation Gain;
        regulation is expected to have the most effect in the spatial unit that is
        currently Viable, allowing the species to become Functional there and contributing
        to an overall score of 55%. Finally, the species breeds extremely quickly,
        so if effective fisheries management were implemented rangewide, within 100
        years the species could easily be Viable in all spatial units, and Functional
        in one, for an overall score of 78%. Therefore, the Recovery Potential for
        the Bonnethead Shark is Medium.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFor additional
        data, see the \u003ca href=\u0026quot;https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/gss-supplementary\u0026quot;
        target=\u0026quot;_self\u0026quot;\u003eSupplementary Information\u003c/a\u003e
        document.\u003c/p\u003e","species_recovery_category":"Largely Depleted","species_recovery_score_best":"44%","species_recovery_score_minimum":"44%","species_recovery_score_maximum":"44%","conservation_legacy_category":"High","conservation_legacy_best":"33%","conservation_legacy_minimum":"11%","conservation_legacy_maximum":"33%","conservation_dependence_category":"High","conservation_dependence_best":"33%","conservation_dependence_minimum":"33%","conservation_dependence_maximum":"33%","conservation_gain_category":"Medium","conservation_gain_best":"11%","conservation_gain_minimum":"0%","conservation_gain_maximum":"11%","recovery_potential_category":"Medium","recovery_potential_best":"33%","recovery_potential_minimum":"33%","recovery_potential_maximum":"33%","assessor_names":"P\u0026eacute;rez-Jim\u0026eacute;nez,
        J.C.","reviewer_names":"Finucci, B., Rigby, C.L. \u0026 Grace, M.K.","contributors":null,"facilitators":"Grace,
        M.K.","compilers":null,"url":"https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/39387/205765567","assessment_date":"2021-10-31","taxon":{"sis_id":39387,"scientific_name":"Sphyrna
        tiburo","species_taxa":[],"subpopulation_taxa":[],"infrarank_taxa":[],"kingdom_name":"ANIMALIA","phylum_name":"CHORDATA","class_name":"CHONDRICHTHYES","order_name":"CARCHARHINIFORMES","family_name":"SPHYRNIDAE","genus_name":"Sphyrna","species_name":"tiburo","subpopulation_name":null,"infra_name":null,"authority":"(Linnaeus,
        1758)","species":true,"subpopulation":false,"infrarank":false,"ssc_groups":[{"name":"IUCN
        SSC Shark Specialist Group (sharks and rays)","url":"https://www.iucnssg.org","description":"Chair:
        Rima Jabado (email: rimajabado@hotmail.com)\nRed List Authority Coordinator:
        Cassie Rigby (email: crigby@westnet.com.au)"}],"common_names":[{"main":true,"name":"Bonnethead
        Shark","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}}],"synonyms":[{"name":"Squalus
        tiburo Linnaeus, 1758","status":"ACCEPTED","genus_name":"Squalus","species_name":"tiburo","species_author":"Linnaeus,
        1758","infrarank_author":null,"subpopulation_name":null,"infra_type":null,"infra_name":null}]}},{"assessment_year":"2022","weights":"Fine-resolution","justification":"\u003cp\u003eThe
        Western Tragopan has a Species Recovery Score of 35% (Largely Depleted). However,
        without the legal protection it has received, it is estimated that the score
        would only be 10% today, giving it a Low Conservation Legacy (relative to
        the current score). While the relatively slow-growing species is not expected
        to improve in score over the next 10 years (Conservation Gain of Zero), if
        conservation actions were to stop, over that same time frame the species\u0026#39;
        score is predicted to plummet to 10% (Low Conservation Dependence, relative
        to current score). Over 100 years, it would be possible to restore the species
        to viability throughout its range, leading to a score of 65% (Medium Recovery
        Potential).\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFor additional data, see the \u003ca
        href=\u0026quot;https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/gss-supplementary\u0026quot;
        target=\u0026quot;_self\u0026quot;\u003eSupplementary Information\u003c/a\u003e
        document.\u003c/p\u003e","species_recovery_category":"Largely Depleted","species_recovery_score_best":"35%","species_recovery_score_minimum":"35%","species_recovery_score_maximum":"35%","conservation_legacy_category":"Low","conservation_legacy_best":"10%","conservation_legacy_minimum":"10%","conservation_legacy_maximum":"20%","conservation_dependence_category":"Low","conservation_dependence_best":"10%","conservation_dependence_minimum":"10%","conservation_dependence_maximum":"35%","conservation_gain_category":"Zero","conservation_gain_best":"0%","conservation_gain_minimum":"0%","conservation_gain_maximum":"0%","recovery_potential_category":"Medium","recovery_potential_best":"30%","recovery_potential_minimum":"20%","recovery_potential_maximum":"45%","assessor_names":"Gupta,
        G. \u0026 McGowan, P.","reviewer_names":"Kaul, R. \u0026 Grace, M.K.","contributors":null,"facilitators":"Grace,
        M.K. \u0026 Young, R.E.","compilers":null,"url":"https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/22679147/112467383","assessment_date":"2022-07-21","taxon":{"sis_id":22679147,"scientific_name":"Tragopan
        melanocephalus","species_taxa":[],"subpopulation_taxa":[],"infrarank_taxa":[],"kingdom_name":"ANIMALIA","phylum_name":"CHORDATA","class_name":"AVES","order_name":"GALLIFORMES","family_name":"PHASIANIDAE","genus_name":"Tragopan","species_name":"melanocephalus","subpopulation_name":null,"infra_name":null,"authority":"(Gray,
        1829)","species":true,"subpopulation":false,"infrarank":false,"ssc_groups":[{"name":"IUCN
        SSC Bird Red List Authority (BirdLife International)","url":"https://www.birdlife.org/","description":"Red
        List Authority Coordinator: Ian Burfield (ian.burfield@birdlife.org)"}],"common_names":[{"main":false,"name":"Black-headed
        Tragopan","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Western
        Horned-pheasant","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Jejeel","language":{"code":"urd","description":{"en":"Urdu"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Tragopán
        de Cabeza Negra","language":{"code":"spa","description":{"en":"Spanish; Castilian"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Tragopán
        Dorsigrís","language":{"code":"spa","description":{"en":"Spanish; Castilian"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Tragopán
        Occidental","language":{"code":"spa","description":{"en":"Spanish; Castilian"}}},{"main":true,"name":"Western
        Tragopan","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}}],"synonyms":[]}},{"assessment_year":"2022","weights":"Default","justification":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eTrechus
        terrabravensis\u003c/em\u003e has a Species Recovery Score of 83% (Slightly
        Depleted). The species is endemic to Ilha Terceira. While much forest has
        been cleared on the island, and protected areas established in response, the
        species is a habitat specialist restricted to inaccessible areas and it is
        unclear how much habitat has been lost to human development; therefore, the
        Conservation Legacy is Indeterminate. The species has a High Conservation
        Dependence; without continued management of invasive plants, the species\u0026#39;
        score is expected to decrease to 25% over the next 10 years. However, continued
        removal of invasive plants and creation of corridors is expected to benefit
        the species in future, with maximum expected recovery to 92% achievable within
        the next 10 years, giving the species a Low Conservation Gain and Recovery
        Potential. \u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFor additional data, see the \u003ca
        href=\u0026quot;https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/gss-supplementary\u0026quot;
        target=\u0026quot;_self\u0026quot;\u003eSupplementary Information\u003c/a\u003e
        document.\u003c/p\u003e","species_recovery_category":"Slightly Depleted","species_recovery_score_best":"83%","species_recovery_score_minimum":"58%","species_recovery_score_maximum":"92%","conservation_legacy_category":"Indeterminate","conservation_legacy_best":"33%","conservation_legacy_minimum":"-8%","conservation_legacy_maximum":"67%","conservation_dependence_category":"High","conservation_dependence_best":"58%","conservation_dependence_minimum":"33%","conservation_dependence_maximum":"67%","conservation_gain_category":"Low","conservation_gain_best":"8%","conservation_gain_minimum":"-33%","conservation_gain_maximum":"33%","recovery_potential_category":"Low","recovery_potential_best":"8%","recovery_potential_minimum":"-58%","recovery_potential_maximum":"33%","assessor_names":"Borges,
        P.A.V.","reviewer_names":"Boieiro, M. \u0026 Grace, M.K.","contributors":null,"facilitators":"Grace,
        M.K. \u0026 Young, R.E.","compilers":null,"url":"https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/97126159/99166599","assessment_date":"2022-07-21","taxon":{"sis_id":97126159,"scientific_name":"Trechus
        terrabravensis","species_taxa":[],"subpopulation_taxa":[],"infrarank_taxa":[],"kingdom_name":"ANIMALIA","phylum_name":"ARTHROPODA","class_name":"INSECTA","order_name":"COLEOPTERA","family_name":"CARABIDAE","genus_name":"Trechus","species_name":"terrabravensis","subpopulation_name":null,"infra_name":null,"authority":"Borges,
        Serrano \u0026amp; Amorim, 2004","species":true,"subpopulation":false,"infrarank":false,"ssc_groups":[],"common_names":[{"main":false,"name":"Carocho-da-terra-brava","language":{"code":"por","description":{"en":"Portuguese"}}},{"main":true,"name":"Ground-beetle","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}}],"synonyms":[]}},{"assessment_year":"2021","weights":"Default","justification":"\u003cp\u003eThe
        Common Birdwing\u0026#39;s Species Recovery Score of 52% (Moderately Depleted)
        is because, of the species\u0026#39; 14 spatial units, it is only Viable in
        four of them, and Functional in only one. The Common Birdwing\u0026#39;s Conservation
        Impact Metrics (Conservation Legacy, Conservation Gain, Conservation Dependence,
        and Recovery Potential) are all Indeterminate. The species was historically
        popular with collectors and has experienced declines in its forest habitat
        throughout its range; while the species is legally protected in many countries,
        and occurs within a number of protected areas, estimating the impacts of these
        actions requires more monitoring data.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFor additional
        data, see the \u003ca href=\u0026quot;https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/gss-supplementary\u0026quot;
        target=\u0026quot;_self\u0026quot;\u003eSupplementary Information\u003c/a\u003e
        document.\u003c/p\u003e","species_recovery_category":"Moderately Depleted","species_recovery_score_best":"52%","species_recovery_score_minimum":"38%","species_recovery_score_maximum":"64%","conservation_legacy_category":"Indeterminate","conservation_legacy_best":"7%","conservation_legacy_minimum":"-21%","conservation_legacy_maximum":"40%","conservation_dependence_category":"Indeterminate","conservation_dependence_best":"10%","conservation_dependence_minimum":"-21%","conservation_dependence_maximum":"43%","conservation_gain_category":"Indeterminate","conservation_gain_best":"25%","conservation_gain_minimum":"-12%","conservation_gain_maximum":"52%","recovery_potential_category":"Indeterminate","recovery_potential_best":"38%","recovery_potential_minimum":"-2%","recovery_potential_maximum":"62%","assessor_names":"Sultana,
        S. \u0026 Chowdhury, G.W.","reviewer_names":"B\u0026ouml;hm, M. \u0026 Grace,
        M.K.","contributors":null,"facilitators":"Grace, M.K.","compilers":null,"url":"https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/91188632/118127416","assessment_date":"2021-10-31","taxon":{"sis_id":91188632,"scientific_name":"Troides
        helena","species_taxa":[],"subpopulation_taxa":[],"infrarank_taxa":[],"kingdom_name":"ANIMALIA","phylum_name":"ARTHROPODA","class_name":"INSECTA","order_name":"LEPIDOPTERA","family_name":"PAPILIONIDAE","genus_name":"Troides","species_name":"helena","subpopulation_name":null,"infra_name":null,"authority":"(Linnaeus,
        1758)","species":true,"subpopulation":false,"infrarank":false,"ssc_groups":[{"name":"IUCN
        SSC Butterfly Specialist Group","url":"https://www.iucn.org/commissions/ssc-groups/invertebrates/butterfly","description":"Chair
        and Red List Authority Coordinator: Monika Böhm (email: mbohm@indyzoo.com)"}],"common_names":[{"main":false,"name":"Sunaulo
        Chari Putali","language":{"code":"nep","description":{"en":"Nepali"}}},{"main":true,"name":"Common
        Birdwing","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}}],"synonyms":[{"name":"Papilio
        helena Linnaeus, 1758","status":"ACCEPTED","genus_name":"Papilio","species_name":"helena","species_author":"Linnaeus,
        1758","infrarank_author":null,"subpopulation_name":null,"infra_type":null,"infra_name":null}]}},{"assessment_year":"2021","weights":"Default","justification":"\u003cp\u003eThe
        Species Recovery Score of 75% (Moderately Depleted) is due to Blue Cranes
        being Functional in two spatial units, Viable in the third, and Present in
        the fourth. The Blue Crane has a High Conservation Legacy; without past conservation
        action including protected areas, campaigns to reduce human-wildlife conflict,
        and steps taken to reduce mortality from collisions with powerlines, Blue
        Cranes would have a score of 33% today. There is a Medium Conservation Dependence;
        if conservation actions were to stop, it is expected that its status would
        deteriorate across its range over a 10-year period, bringing the score to
        42%. Blue Cranes have a Medium Conservation Gain; within a 10-year period,
        if conservation continues, it is expected that the species will become Functional
        in three out of four spatial units, leading to a score of 92%. Finally, within
        100 years it would be possible for the Blue Crane to become Functional across
        its range, leading to a score of 100%. Therefore, the Recovery Potential for
        Blue Cranes is Medium, relative to its already high score.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFor
        additional data, see the \u003ca href=\u0026quot;https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/gss-supplementary\u0026quot;
        target=\u0026quot;_self\u0026quot;\u003eSupplementary Information\u003c/a\u003e
        document.\u003c/p\u003e","species_recovery_category":"Moderately Depleted","species_recovery_score_best":"75%","species_recovery_score_minimum":"67%","species_recovery_score_maximum":"75%","conservation_legacy_category":"High","conservation_legacy_best":"42%","conservation_legacy_minimum":"17%","conservation_legacy_maximum":"50%","conservation_dependence_category":"Medium","conservation_dependence_best":"33%","conservation_dependence_minimum":"8%","conservation_dependence_maximum":"50%","conservation_gain_category":"Medium","conservation_gain_best":"17%","conservation_gain_minimum":"0%","conservation_gain_maximum":"25%","recovery_potential_category":"Medium","recovery_potential_best":"25%","recovery_potential_minimum":"17%","recovery_potential_maximum":"33%","assessor_names":"Craig,
        C.A., Scott, A. \u0026 Scott, M.","reviewer_names":"Smith, T. \u0026 Grace,
        M.K.","contributors":null,"facilitators":"Grace, M.K.","compilers":"Wynter,
        V.","url":"https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/22692109/177514877","assessment_date":"2021-10-31","taxon":{"sis_id":22692109,"scientific_name":"Anthropoides
        paradiseus","species_taxa":[],"subpopulation_taxa":[],"infrarank_taxa":[],"kingdom_name":"ANIMALIA","phylum_name":"CHORDATA","class_name":"AVES","order_name":"GRUIFORMES","family_name":"GRUIDAE","genus_name":"Anthropoides","species_name":"paradiseus","subpopulation_name":null,"infra_name":null,"authority":"(Lichtenstein,
        1793)","species":true,"subpopulation":false,"infrarank":false,"ssc_groups":[{"name":"IUCN
        SSC Bird Red List Authority (BirdLife International)","url":"https://www.birdlife.org/","description":"Red
        List Authority Coordinator: Ian Burfield (ian.burfield@birdlife.org)"}],"common_names":[{"main":false,"name":"Stanley
        Crane","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Grue
        bleue","language":{"code":"fre","description":{"en":"French"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Grue
        de paradis","language":{"code":"fre","description":{"en":"French"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Grulla
        Azul","language":{"code":"spa","description":{"en":"Spanish; Castilian"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Grulla
        de Paraiso","language":{"code":"spa","description":{"en":"Spanish; Castilian"}}},{"main":true,"name":"Blue
        Crane","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}}],"synonyms":[{"name":"Anthropoides
        paradisea ssp. paradisea (Lichtenstein, 1793) — Dowsett and Forbes-Watson
        (1993)","status":"ACCEPTED","genus_name":"Anthropoides","species_name":"paradisea","species_author":null,"infrarank_author":"(Lichtenstein,
        1793) — Dowsett and Forbes-Watson (1993)","subpopulation_name":null,"infra_type":"subspecies","infra_name":"paradisea"},{"name":"Grus
        paradisea (Lichtenstein, 1793)","status":"ACCEPTED","genus_name":"Grus","species_name":"paradisea","species_author":"(Lichtenstein,
        1793)","infrarank_author":null,"subpopulation_name":null,"infra_type":null,"infra_name":null},{"name":"Ardea
        paradisea Lichtenstein, 1793","status":"ACCEPTED","genus_name":"Ardea","species_name":"paradisea","species_author":"Lichtenstein,
        1793","infrarank_author":null,"subpopulation_name":null,"infra_type":null,"infra_name":null}]}},{"assessment_year":"2022","weights":"Default","justification":"\u003cp\u003eThe
        Sehuencas Water Frog has a Species Recovery Score of 11% (Critically Depleted)
        as it is Absent in most of its indigenous range and threatened (Present) where
        it remains. The species has a Conservation Legacy of Zero; it has remained
        extant despite difficulties in effectively managing the protected area in
        which it is found. Given this difficulty in managing the protected area, the
        Conservation Dependence is also Zero; if the species has persisted despite
        continued disturbance to date, it will likely do so over the next 10 years.
        The status of the species is not expected to improve unless management improves,
        which is unlikely to happen over the next 10 years (Zero Conservation Gain),
        but if it does, over the next 100 years, at least one Viable population is
        possible, bringing the score to 22% (Medium Recovery Potential).\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFor
        additional data, see the \u003ca href=\u0026quot;https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/gss-supplementary\u0026quot;
        target=\u0026quot;_self\u0026quot;\u003eSupplementary Information\u003c/a\u003e
        document.\u003c/p\u003e","species_recovery_category":"Critically Depleted","species_recovery_score_best":"11%","species_recovery_score_minimum":"11%","species_recovery_score_maximum":"11%","conservation_legacy_category":"Zero","conservation_legacy_best":"0%","conservation_legacy_minimum":"0%","conservation_legacy_maximum":"0%","conservation_dependence_category":"Zero","conservation_dependence_best":"0%","conservation_dependence_minimum":"0%","conservation_dependence_maximum":"11%","conservation_gain_category":"Zero","conservation_gain_best":"0%","conservation_gain_minimum":"0%","conservation_gain_maximum":"0%","recovery_potential_category":"Medium","recovery_potential_best":"11%","recovery_potential_minimum":"0%","recovery_potential_maximum":"22%","assessor_names":"Camacho-Badani,
        T. \u0026 Barron-Lavayen, S.","reviewer_names":"Mu\u0026ntilde;oz, O.Q. \u0026
        Grace, M.K.","contributors":null,"facilitators":"Grace, M.K. \u0026 Young
        R.E.","compilers":null,"url":"https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/57369/154335458","assessment_date":"2022-07-21","taxon":{"sis_id":57369,"scientific_name":"Telmatobius
        yuracare","species_taxa":[],"subpopulation_taxa":[],"infrarank_taxa":[],"kingdom_name":"ANIMALIA","phylum_name":"CHORDATA","class_name":"AMPHIBIA","order_name":"ANURA","family_name":"TELMATOBIIDAE","genus_name":"Telmatobius","species_name":"yuracare","subpopulation_name":null,"infra_name":null,"authority":"De
        la Riva, 1994","species":true,"subpopulation":false,"infrarank":false,"ssc_groups":[{"name":"IUCN
        SSC Amphibian Specialist Group","url":"https://www.iucn-amphibians.org/","description":"Chair:
        Ariadne Angulo (email: aangulo@amphibians.org)\nRed List Authority Coordinator:
        Jennifer Luedtke (email: jluedtke@amphibians.org)\nNewsletter: http://www.amphibians.org/froglog/"}],"common_names":[{"main":true,"name":"Sehuencas
        Water Frog","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}}],"synonyms":[]}},{"assessment_year":"2023","weights":"Default","justification":"\u003cp\u003eThe
        Species Recovery Score of 22% (Largely Depleted) is due to the Iberian Lynx
        being Absent in two of its six spatial units, and Present but not Functional
        in the remaining four. Despite its depleted state, the species has a High
        Conservation Legacy; measures such as area protection, reintroductions, poaching
        prevention, road kill mitigation, and genetic management have reversed population
        declines and prevented likely extinction. Continuation of these measures,
        as well as planned reintroductions to spatial units in which the species is
        currently Absent, are expected to double the Recovery Score in 10 years: a
        Medium Conservation Gain. If all conservation were to stop, declines would
        resume and the species would probably be extirpated from the East Spain spatial
        unit within 10 years, reducing the Recovery Score to 17%. However, populations
        would persist in at least three spatial units in this timeframe, so the Conservation
        Dependence is Low. Enough suitable habitat remains that the species could
        reach Fully Recovered status in 100 years, assuming conservation efforts continue
        with maximum efficacy. There is some uncertainty in this prediction, as the
        possibility of multiple disease outbreaks in European Rabbits (the species''
        main prey item) could hamper progress, but the Recovery Potential remains
        High.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFor additional data, see the \u003ca href=\u0026quot;https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/gss-supplementary\u0026quot;
        target=\u0026quot;_self\u0026quot;\u003eSupplementary Information\u003c/a\u003e
        document.\u003c/p\u003e","species_recovery_category":"Largely Depleted","species_recovery_score_best":"22%","species_recovery_score_minimum":"22%","species_recovery_score_maximum":"22%","conservation_legacy_category":"High","conservation_legacy_best":"22%","conservation_legacy_minimum":"11%","conservation_legacy_maximum":"22%","conservation_dependence_category":"Low","conservation_dependence_best":"6%","conservation_dependence_minimum":"0%","conservation_dependence_maximum":"6%","conservation_gain_category":"Medium","conservation_gain_best":"22%","conservation_gain_minimum":"0%","conservation_gain_maximum":"44%","recovery_potential_category":"High","recovery_potential_best":"78%","recovery_potential_minimum":"11%","recovery_potential_maximum":"78%","assessor_names":"Ortiz,
        F.J.S., Carlton, E., Lanz, T. \u0026 Breitenmoser, U.","reviewer_names":"Alonso,
        G.G, Zamora, G.L., Blanco, A.R., Parra, M.L. \u0026 Cygan, M.G.W.","contributors":null,"facilitators":"Grace,
        M.K. \u0026 Young, R.E.","compilers":null,"url":"https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/12520/218695618","assessment_date":"2023-10-31","taxon":{"sis_id":12520,"scientific_name":"Lynx
        pardinus","species_taxa":[],"subpopulation_taxa":[],"infrarank_taxa":[],"kingdom_name":"ANIMALIA","phylum_name":"CHORDATA","class_name":"MAMMALIA","order_name":"CARNIVORA","family_name":"FELIDAE","genus_name":"Lynx","species_name":"pardinus","subpopulation_name":null,"infra_name":null,"authority":"(Temminck,
        1827)","species":true,"subpopulation":false,"infrarank":false,"ssc_groups":[{"name":"IUCN
        SSC Cat Specialist Group (wild cats)","url":"http://www.catsg.org/","description":"Chair:
        Christine Breitenmoser (email: ch.breitenmoser@kora.ch) and Urs Max Breitenmoser
        (email: urs.breitenmoser@vetsuisse.unibe.ch)\nRed List Authority Coordinator:
        Tabea Lanz (email: t.lanz@kora.ch)\nNewsletter: http://www.catsg.org/index.php?id=7"}],"common_names":[{"main":false,"name":"Lince
        ibérico","language":{"code":"por","description":{"en":"Portuguese"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Lince
        ibérico","language":{"code":"spa","description":{"en":"Spanish; Castilian"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Lynx
        pardelle","language":{"code":"fre","description":{"en":"French"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Pardelluchs","language":{"code":"ger","description":{"en":"German"}}},{"main":true,"name":"Iberian
        Lynx","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}}],"synonyms":[{"name":"Felis
        pardina Temminck, 1827","status":"ACCEPTED","genus_name":"Felis","species_name":"pardina","species_author":"Temminck,
        1827","infrarank_author":null,"subpopulation_name":null,"infra_type":null,"infra_name":null}]}},{"assessment_year":"2022","weights":"Default","justification":"\u003cp\u003eThe
        Pygmy Hog has a Species Recovery Score of 8% (Critically Depleted) as it has
        been extirpated from the majority of its indigenous range. However, without
        protected areas and reintroductions, the species would almost certainly be
        extinct today, resulting in a High Conservation Legacy. Over the next 10 years,
        if conservation stopped, the species is expected to become Absent in one spatial
        unit, decreasing the score to 4% (Low Conservation Dependence); conversely,
        over the same time period, the species is likely to be reintroduced to another
        spatial unit, increasing the score to 13% (Low Conservation Gain). In the
        long term, it would be possible to reintroduce the species in a handful of
        spatial units, and to establish a Functional population in one spatial unit,
        bringing the score to 29% (High Recovery Potential, relative to current score).\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFor
        additional data, see the \u003ca href=\u0026quot;https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/gss-supplementary\u0026quot;
        target=\u0026quot;_self\u0026quot;\u003eSupplementary Information\u003c/a\u003e
        document.\u003c/p\u003e","species_recovery_category":"Critically Depleted","species_recovery_score_best":"8%","species_recovery_score_minimum":"8%","species_recovery_score_maximum":"8%","conservation_legacy_category":"High","conservation_legacy_best":"8%","conservation_legacy_minimum":"0%","conservation_legacy_maximum":"8%","conservation_dependence_category":"Low","conservation_dependence_best":"4%","conservation_dependence_minimum":"0%","conservation_dependence_maximum":"8%","conservation_gain_category":"Low","conservation_gain_best":"4%","conservation_gain_minimum":"0%","conservation_gain_maximum":"13%","recovery_potential_category":"High","recovery_potential_best":"21%","recovery_potential_minimum":"4%","recovery_potential_maximum":"38%","assessor_names":"Deka,
        P.,  Hudson, M., Das, D. \u0026 Kennerley, R.","reviewer_names":"Narayan,
        G. \u0026 Grace, M.K.","contributors":null,"facilitators":"Grace, M.K. \u0026
        Young, R.E.","compilers":null,"url":"https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/21172/44139115","assessment_date":"2022-07-21","taxon":{"sis_id":21172,"scientific_name":"Porcula
        salvania","species_taxa":[],"subpopulation_taxa":[],"infrarank_taxa":[],"kingdom_name":"ANIMALIA","phylum_name":"CHORDATA","class_name":"MAMMALIA","order_name":"ARTIODACTYLA","family_name":"SUIDAE","genus_name":"Porcula","species_name":"salvania","subpopulation_name":null,"infra_name":null,"authority":"Hodgson,
        1847","species":true,"subpopulation":false,"infrarank":false,"ssc_groups":[],"common_names":[{"main":false,"name":"Jabalí
        Enano","language":{"code":"spa","description":{"en":"Spanish; Castilian"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Jabalí
        Pigmeo","language":{"code":"spa","description":{"en":"Spanish; Castilian"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Nal
        Gahori","language":{"code":"asm","description":{"en":"Assamese"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Sanglier
        nain","language":{"code":"fre","description":{"en":"French"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Sanglier
        pygmée","language":{"code":"fre","description":{"en":"French"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Sano
        Banel","language":{"code":"nep","description":{"en":"Nepali"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Takuri
        Borah","language":{"code":"asm","description":{"en":"Assamese"}}},{"main":true,"name":"Pygmy
        Hog","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}}],"synonyms":[{"name":"Sus
        salvanius (Hodgson, 1847)","status":"ADDED","genus_name":"Sus","species_name":"salvanius","species_author":"(Hodgson,
        1847)","infrarank_author":null,"subpopulation_name":null,"infra_type":null,"infra_name":null}]}},{"assessment_year":"2022","weights":"Default","justification":"\u003cp\u003eThe
        Chinstrap Penguin has a Species Recovery Score of 80% (Moderately Depleted).
        The primary conservation actions for this species have included regulation
        of the fisheries of their prey, but the species\u0026#39; score is not expected
        to be different today in the absence of this action (Conservation Legacy of
        Zero), though there is uncertainty around this estimate. Over the next 10
        years, the best estimate is that the species would decline if conservation
        action stopped, but the future impact of conservation actions is hard to estimate
        precisely given that climate change is predicted to cause declines in species
        status over the same period; therefore, a dynamic baseline was used, but even
        so Conservation Dependence and Gain are both Indeterminate. Finally, in 100
        years, due to climate change the most optimistic estimate is that the species
        will have declined to a score of 60%, meaning that the Recovery Potential
        is Negative.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFor additional data, see the \u003ca
        href=\u0026quot;https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/gss-supplementary\u0026quot;
        target=\u0026quot;_self\u0026quot;\u003eSupplementary Information\u003c/a\u003e
        document.\u003c/p\u003e","species_recovery_category":"Moderately Depleted","species_recovery_score_best":"80%","species_recovery_score_minimum":"53%","species_recovery_score_maximum":"93%","conservation_legacy_category":"Zero","conservation_legacy_best":"0%","conservation_legacy_minimum":"-40%","conservation_legacy_maximum":"40%","conservation_dependence_category":"Indeterminate","conservation_dependence_best":"7%","conservation_dependence_minimum":"-47%","conservation_dependence_maximum":"47%","conservation_gain_category":"Indeterminate","conservation_gain_best":"0%","conservation_gain_minimum":"-47%","conservation_gain_maximum":"47%","recovery_potential_category":"Negative","recovery_potential_best":"-20%","recovery_potential_minimum":"-60%","recovery_potential_maximum":"33%","assessor_names":"Strycker,
        N. \u0026 Lynch, H.","reviewer_names":"Hart, T. \u0026 Grace, M.K.","contributors":null,"facilitators":"Grace,
        M.K. \u0026 Young, R.E.","compilers":null,"url":"https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/22697761/184807209","assessment_date":"2022-07-21","taxon":{"sis_id":22697761,"scientific_name":"Pygoscelis
        antarcticus","species_taxa":[],"subpopulation_taxa":[],"infrarank_taxa":[],"kingdom_name":"ANIMALIA","phylum_name":"CHORDATA","class_name":"AVES","order_name":"SPHENISCIFORMES","family_name":"SPHENISCIDAE","genus_name":"Pygoscelis","species_name":"antarcticus","subpopulation_name":null,"infra_name":null,"authority":"(Forster,
        1781)","species":true,"subpopulation":false,"infrarank":false,"ssc_groups":[{"name":"IUCN
        SSC Bird Red List Authority (BirdLife International)","url":"https://www.birdlife.org/","description":"Red
        List Authority Coordinator: Ian Burfield (ian.burfield@birdlife.org)"}],"common_names":[{"main":false,"name":"Pingüino
        barbijo","language":{"code":"spa","description":{"en":"Spanish; Castilian"}}},{"main":true,"name":"Chinstrap
        Penguin","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}}],"synonyms":[{"name":"Pygoscelis
        antarctica (Forster, 1781) [orth. error] — Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993)","status":"ACCEPTED","genus_name":"Pygoscelis","species_name":"antarctica","species_author":"(Forster,
        1781) [orth. error] — Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993)","infrarank_author":null,"subpopulation_name":null,"infra_type":null,"infra_name":null},{"name":"Pygoscelis
        antarctica (Forster, 1781) [orth. error] — BirdLife International (2004)","status":"ACCEPTED","genus_name":"Pygoscelis","species_name":"antarctica","species_author":"(Forster,
        1781) [orth. error] — BirdLife International (2004)","infrarank_author":null,"subpopulation_name":null,"infra_type":null,"infra_name":null},{"name":"Pygoscelis
        antarctica (Forster, 1781) [orth. error] — Turbott (1990)","status":"ACCEPTED","genus_name":"Pygoscelis","species_name":"antarctica","species_author":"(Forster,
        1781) [orth. error] — Turbott (1990)","infrarank_author":null,"subpopulation_name":null,"infra_type":null,"infra_name":null},{"name":"Pygoscelis
        antarctica (Forster, 1781) [orth. error] — Christidis and Boles (1994)","status":"ACCEPTED","genus_name":"Pygoscelis","species_name":"antarctica","species_author":"(Forster,
        1781) [orth. error] — Christidis and Boles (1994)","infrarank_author":null,"subpopulation_name":null,"infra_type":null,"infra_name":null}]}},{"assessment_year":"2022","weights":"Default","justification":"\u003cp\u003eThe
        Mountain Chicken has a Species Recovery Score of 5% (Critically Depleted)
        as it has been lost from the majority of islands on which it was once found,
        and is threatened (Present) only on Dominica, where it was driven to near-extinction
        by chytridiomycosis. Nonetheless, it has a High Conservation Legacy, because
        if a hunting ban and ban on importing mongooses had not been implemented on
        Dominica (the main non-chytrid threats to the species), the Mountain Chicken
        would almost certainly be extinct today. Nonetheless, if these actions stopped,
        the species could easily go extinct within 10 years (High Conservation Dependence).
        The remaining individuals may have a genetic resistance to chytrid (though
        this needs to be confirmed), and if chytrid control measures are put in place
        then this pool of individuals could be used for reintroductions to Montserrat
        within 10 years, bringing the score to 10% (Low Conservation Gain). Nonetheless,
        this potential genetic basis for resistance, combined with control of invasive
        mammals on the islands of its indigenous range, could allow for the species
        to recovery to 43% within 100 years (High Recovery Potential).\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFor
        additional data, see the \u003ca href=\u0026quot;https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/gss-supplementary\u0026quot;
        target=\u0026quot;_self\u0026quot;\u003eSupplementary Information\u003c/a\u003e
        document.\u003c/p\u003e","species_recovery_category":"Critically Depleted","species_recovery_score_best":"5%","species_recovery_score_minimum":"5%","species_recovery_score_maximum":"10%","conservation_legacy_category":"High","conservation_legacy_best":"5%","conservation_legacy_minimum":"0%","conservation_legacy_maximum":"10%","conservation_dependence_category":"High","conservation_dependence_best":"5%","conservation_dependence_minimum":"0%","conservation_dependence_maximum":"10%","conservation_gain_category":"Low","conservation_gain_best":"5%","conservation_gain_minimum":"-5%","conservation_gain_maximum":"10%","recovery_potential_category":"High","recovery_potential_best":"38%","recovery_potential_minimum":"10%","recovery_potential_maximum":"48%","assessor_names":"Hudson,
        M.A., Cunningham, A. \u0026 Stephenson, P.J.","reviewer_names":"Tapley, B.
        \u0026 Grace, M.K.","contributors":null,"facilitators":"Grace, M.K. \u0026
        Young, R.E.","compilers":null,"url":"https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/57125/3055585","assessment_date":"2022-07-21","taxon":{"sis_id":57125,"scientific_name":"Leptodactylus
        fallax","species_taxa":[],"subpopulation_taxa":[],"infrarank_taxa":[],"kingdom_name":"ANIMALIA","phylum_name":"CHORDATA","class_name":"AMPHIBIA","order_name":"ANURA","family_name":"LEPTODACTYLIDAE","genus_name":"Leptodactylus","species_name":"fallax","subpopulation_name":null,"infra_name":null,"authority":"Müller,
        1926","species":true,"subpopulation":false,"infrarank":false,"ssc_groups":[{"name":"IUCN
        SSC Amphibian Specialist Group","url":"https://www.iucn-amphibians.org/","description":"Chair:
        Ariadne Angulo (email: aangulo@amphibians.org)\nRed List Authority Coordinator:
        Jennifer Luedtke (email: jluedtke@amphibians.org)\nNewsletter: http://www.amphibians.org/froglog/"}],"common_names":[{"main":false,"name":"Giant
        Ditch Frog","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}},{"main":true,"name":"Mountain
        Chicken","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}}],"synonyms":[{"name":"Leptodactylus
        dominicensis Cochran, 1923","status":"MERGE","genus_name":"Leptodactylus","species_name":"dominicensis","species_author":"Cochran,
        1923","infrarank_author":null,"subpopulation_name":null,"infra_type":null,"infra_name":null}]}},{"assessment_year":"2021","weights":"Default","justification":"\u003cp\u003eThe
        Species Recovery Score of 8% (Critically Depleted) for the Pale-headed Brush-finch
        is due to the species being Absent in three of four spatial units, and only
        Present in the fourth. The Pale-headed Brush-finch has a High Conservation
        Legacy; without past conservation action, the Pale-headed Brush-finch would
        almost certainly be extinct. The species has a Conservation Dependence of
        Zero; even if conservation actions were to stop, the species would likely
        remain Present in its only extant spatial unit over the next 10 years. The
        Pale-headed Brush-finch has a Low Conservation Gain; within a 10-year period,
        if conservation continues, it is expected that its score would double (to
        17%) as the species expands in its current spatial unit. Finally, within 100
        years it would be possible for the Pale-headed Brush-finch to be reintroduced
        in the spatial units where it is currently Absent, and to become Functional
        where it currently exists, leading to a score of 75%. Therefore, the Recovery
        Potential for the Pale-headed Brush-finch is High.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFor
        additional data, see the \u003ca href=\u0026quot;https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/gss-supplementary\u0026quot;
        target=\u0026quot;_self\u0026quot;\u003eSupplementary Information\u003c/a\u003e
        document.\u003c/p\u003e","species_recovery_category":"Critically Depleted","species_recovery_score_best":"8%","species_recovery_score_minimum":"8%","species_recovery_score_maximum":"8%","conservation_legacy_category":"High","conservation_legacy_best":"8%","conservation_legacy_minimum":"8%","conservation_legacy_maximum":"8%","conservation_dependence_category":"Zero","conservation_dependence_best":"0%","conservation_dependence_minimum":"0%","conservation_dependence_maximum":"8%","conservation_gain_category":"Low","conservation_gain_best":"8%","conservation_gain_minimum":"0%","conservation_gain_maximum":"33%","recovery_potential_category":"High","recovery_potential_best":"67%","recovery_potential_minimum":"33%","recovery_potential_maximum":"75%","assessor_names":"Hermes,
        C.","reviewer_names":"Fernando, E. \u0026 Grace, M.K.","contributors":"Hartmann,
        S.A. \u0026 Schaefer, H.M.","facilitators":"Grace, M.K.","compilers":"Wynter,
        V.","url":"https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/22721487/181562033","assessment_date":"2021-10-31","taxon":{"sis_id":22721487,"scientific_name":"Atlapetes
        pallidiceps","species_taxa":[],"subpopulation_taxa":[],"infrarank_taxa":[],"kingdom_name":"ANIMALIA","phylum_name":"CHORDATA","class_name":"AVES","order_name":"PASSERIFORMES","family_name":"PASSERELLIDAE","genus_name":"Atlapetes","species_name":"pallidiceps","subpopulation_name":null,"infra_name":null,"authority":"(Sharpe,
        1900)","species":true,"subpopulation":false,"infrarank":false,"ssc_groups":[{"name":"IUCN
        SSC Bird Red List Authority (BirdLife International)","url":"https://www.birdlife.org/","description":"Red
        List Authority Coordinator: Ian Burfield (ian.burfield@birdlife.org)"}],"common_names":[{"main":false,"name":"Pale-headed
        Brush Finch","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Pale-headed
        Brush-Finch","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}},{"main":true,"name":"Pale-headed
        Brush-finch","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}}],"synonyms":[{"name":"Buarremon
        pallidiceps Sharpe, 1900","status":"ACCEPTED","genus_name":"Buarremon","species_name":"pallidiceps","species_author":"Sharpe,
        1900","infrarank_author":null,"subpopulation_name":null,"infra_type":null,"infra_name":null}]}},{"assessment_year":"2022","weights":"Default","justification":"\u003cp\u003eThe
        American Bison has a Species Recovery Score of 17% (Critically Depleted),
        as it is Absent from many of its indigenous spatial units. Nonetheless, the
        majority of extant herds within the species\u0026#39; indigenous range today
        are the result of reintroductions, so the species has a High Conservation
        Legacy. If hunting pressure increased, the species\u0026#39; status would
        decline over the next 10 years to 12%, but the the species would not be driven
        to extinction over that time period (relatively Low Conservation Dependence).
        Additional reintroductions and stabilisation of existing herds could increase
        the score to 22% over the next 10 years (Low Conservation Gain). Over 100
        years, the species could be Functional in most areas where it is currently
        extant, though reintroductions in other areas are complicated by human pressures
        (Medium Recovery Potential).\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFor additional data,
        see the \u003ca href=\u0026quot;https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/gss-supplementary\u0026quot;
        target=\u0026quot;_self\u0026quot;\u003eSupplementary Information\u003c/a\u003e
        document.\u003c/p\u003e","species_recovery_category":"Critically Depleted","species_recovery_score_best":"17%","species_recovery_score_minimum":"17%","species_recovery_score_maximum":"17%","conservation_legacy_category":"High","conservation_legacy_best":"17%","conservation_legacy_minimum":"16%","conservation_legacy_maximum":"17%","conservation_dependence_category":"Low","conservation_dependence_best":"6%","conservation_dependence_minimum":"6%","conservation_dependence_maximum":"13%","conservation_gain_category":"Low","conservation_gain_best":"4%","conservation_gain_minimum":"1%","conservation_gain_maximum":"10%","recovery_potential_category":"Medium","recovery_potential_best":"33%","recovery_potential_minimum":"24%","recovery_potential_maximum":"51%","assessor_names":"Rogers,
        L.R., Ranglack, D.H. \u0026 Plumb, G.","reviewer_names":"Wilson, G. \u0026
        Grace, M.K.","contributors":null,"facilitators":"Grace, M.K. \u0026 Young,
        R.E.","compilers":null,"url":"https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/2815/123789863","assessment_date":"2022-07-21","taxon":{"sis_id":2815,"scientific_name":"Bison
        bison","species_taxa":[],"subpopulation_taxa":[],"infrarank_taxa":[],"kingdom_name":"ANIMALIA","phylum_name":"CHORDATA","class_name":"MAMMALIA","order_name":"ARTIODACTYLA","family_name":"BOVIDAE","genus_name":"Bison","species_name":"bison","subpopulation_name":null,"infra_name":null,"authority":"(Linnaeus,
        1758)","species":true,"subpopulation":false,"infrarank":false,"ssc_groups":[],"common_names":[{"main":false,"name":"Amerikanischer
        Bison","language":{"code":"ger","description":{"en":"German"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Bison
        d''Amerique","language":{"code":"fre","description":{"en":"French"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Bisonte
        Americano","language":{"code":"spa","description":{"en":"Spanish; Castilian"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Edjere","language":{"code":"chp","description":{"en":"Chipewyan;
        Dene Suline"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Moostoosh","language":{"code":"cre","description":{"en":"Cree"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Tatanka","language":{"code":"dak","description":{"en":"Dakota"}}},{"main":true,"name":"American
        Bison","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}}],"synonyms":[{"name":"Bos
        bison Linnaeus, 1758","status":"ACCEPTED","genus_name":"Bos","species_name":"bison","species_author":"Linnaeus,
        1758","infrarank_author":null,"subpopulation_name":null,"infra_type":null,"infra_name":null}]}},{"assessment_year":"2021","weights":"Default","justification":"\u003cp\u003eThe
        Species Recovery Score of 56% (Moderately Depleted) is due to the White Shark
        being threatened in many of its spatial units, and Functional in just one
        currently. The four conservation impact metrics, however, are Indeterminate;
        more research is required to evaluate the past and potential future impacts
        of conservation for this species.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFor additional
        data, see the \u003ca href=\u0026quot;https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/gss-supplementary\u0026quot;
        target=\u0026quot;_self\u0026quot;\u003eSupplementary Information\u003c/a\u003e
        document.\u003c/p\u003e","species_recovery_category":"Moderately Depleted","species_recovery_score_best":"56%","species_recovery_score_minimum":"37%","species_recovery_score_maximum":"74%","conservation_legacy_category":"Indeterminate","conservation_legacy_best":"4%","conservation_legacy_minimum":"-22%","conservation_legacy_maximum":"63%","conservation_dependence_category":"Indeterminate","conservation_dependence_best":"0%","conservation_dependence_minimum":"-22%","conservation_dependence_maximum":"56%","conservation_gain_category":"Indeterminate","conservation_gain_best":"26%","conservation_gain_minimum":"-15%","conservation_gain_maximum":"56%","recovery_potential_category":"Indeterminate","recovery_potential_best":"33%","recovery_potential_minimum":"-4%","recovery_potential_maximum":"63%","assessor_names":"Spaet,
        J.L.Y.","reviewer_names":"Rigby, C.L., Huveneers, C. \u0026 Grace, M.K.","contributors":null,"facilitators":"Grace,
        M.K.","compilers":null,"url":"https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/3855/212629880","assessment_date":"2021-10-31","taxon":{"sis_id":3855,"scientific_name":"Carcharodon
        carcharias","species_taxa":[],"subpopulation_taxa":[],"infrarank_taxa":[],"kingdom_name":"ANIMALIA","phylum_name":"CHORDATA","class_name":"CHONDRICHTHYES","order_name":"LAMNIFORMES","family_name":"LAMNIDAE","genus_name":"Carcharodon","species_name":"carcharias","subpopulation_name":null,"infra_name":null,"authority":"(Linnaeus,
        1758)","species":true,"subpopulation":false,"infrarank":false,"ssc_groups":[{"name":"IUCN
        SSC Shark Specialist Group (sharks and rays)","url":"https://www.iucnssg.org","description":"Chair:
        Rima Jabado (email: rimajabado@hotmail.com)\nRed List Authority Coordinator:
        Cassie Rigby (email: crigby@westnet.com.au)"}],"common_names":[{"main":false,"name":"Great
        White Shark","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}},{"main":true,"name":"White
        Shark","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}}],"synonyms":[{"name":"Squalus
        carcharias Linnaeus, 1758","status":"ACCEPTED","genus_name":"Squalus","species_name":"carcharias","species_author":"Linnaeus,
        1758","infrarank_author":null,"subpopulation_name":null,"infra_type":null,"infra_name":null}]}},{"assessment_year":"2021","weights":"Default","justification":"\u003cp\u003eThe
        Species Recovery Score of 20% (Critically Depleted) is due to the Burrowing
        Bettong being Absent in 36/46 spatial units. The Burrowing Bettong has a High
        Conservation Legacy; without reintroductions in areas where invasive predators
        are excluded, the species would have a score of only 7%. There is a Medium
        Conservation Dependence; if predator exclosures were removed, those spatial
        units would be extirpated over a 10-year period, bringing the score to 9%.
        The Burrowing Bettong has a Low Conservation Gain; within a 10-year period,
        reintroduction is proposed in one spatial unit (Dirk Hartog Island), leading
        to a score of 21%. Finally, the Recovery Potential within 100 years is Indeterminate,
        as climate change could reduce the viability of reintroduction projects throughout
        much of the range, and it is unclear whether introduced predator populations
        can be effectively controlled.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFor additional data,
        see the \u003ca href=\u0026quot;https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/gss-supplementary\u0026quot;
        target=\u0026quot;_self\u0026quot;\u003eSupplementary Information\u003c/a\u003e
        document.\u003c/p\u003e","species_recovery_category":"Critically Depleted","species_recovery_score_best":"20%","species_recovery_score_minimum":"14%","species_recovery_score_maximum":"22%","conservation_legacy_category":"High","conservation_legacy_best":"13%","conservation_legacy_minimum":"7%","conservation_legacy_maximum":"22%","conservation_dependence_category":"Medium","conservation_dependence_best":"10%","conservation_dependence_minimum":"3%","conservation_dependence_maximum":"17%","conservation_gain_category":"Low","conservation_gain_best":"1%","conservation_gain_minimum":"-7%","conservation_gain_maximum":"9%","recovery_potential_category":"Indeterminate","recovery_potential_best":"19%","recovery_potential_minimum":"-9%","recovery_potential_maximum":"43%","assessor_names":"Woinarski,
        J.C.Z.","reviewer_names":"Johnson, C.N. \u0026 Grace, M.K.","contributors":null,"facilitators":"Grace,
        M.K.","compilers":"Wynter, V.","url":"https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/2784/21961179","assessment_date":"2021-10-31","taxon":{"sis_id":2784,"scientific_name":"Bettongia
        lesueur","species_taxa":[],"subpopulation_taxa":[],"infrarank_taxa":[],"kingdom_name":"ANIMALIA","phylum_name":"CHORDATA","class_name":"MAMMALIA","order_name":"DIPROTODONTIA","family_name":"POTOROIDAE","genus_name":"Bettongia","species_name":"lesueur","subpopulation_name":null,"infra_name":null,"authority":"(Quoy
        \u0026amp; Gaimard, 1824)","species":true,"subpopulation":false,"infrarank":false,"ssc_groups":[{"name":"IUCN
        SSC Australasian Marsupial and Monotreme Specialist Group","url":"https://www.iucn.org/commissions/ssc-groups/mammals/specialist-groups-a-e/australasian-marsupial-and-monotreme","description":"Co-Chairs:
        John Woinarski (email: John.Woinarski@cdu.edu.au) and Diana Fisher (email:
        d.fisher@uq.edu.au)\nRed List Authority Coordinator: Chris Johnson (email:
        c.n.johnson@utas.edu.au)"}],"common_names":[{"main":false,"name":"Boodie","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Burrowing
        Rat-kangaroo","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Lesueur’s
        Bettong","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Lesueur''s
        Rat Kangaroo","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Bettongie
        de Lesueur","language":{"code":"fre","description":{"en":"French"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Canguro-rata
        de Lesueur","language":{"code":"spa","description":{"en":"Spanish; Castilian"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Kangourou-rat
        de Lesueur","language":{"code":"fre","description":{"en":"French"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Lesueur-Bürstenkänguru","language":{"code":"ger","description":{"en":"German"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Lesueur-Rattenkänguru","language":{"code":"ger","description":{"en":"German"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Westliches
        Bürstenkänguru","language":{"code":"ger","description":{"en":"German"}}},{"main":true,"name":"Burrowing
        Bettong","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}}],"synonyms":[{"name":"Bettongia
        lesueuri (Quoy \u0026 Gaimard, 1824) [orth. error]","status":"ACCEPTED","genus_name":"Bettongia","species_name":"lesueuri","species_author":"(Quoy
        \u0026 Gaimard, 1824) [orth. error]","infrarank_author":null,"subpopulation_name":null,"infra_type":null,"infra_name":null},{"name":"Hypsiprymnus
        lesueur Quoy \u0026 Gaimard, 1824","status":"ACCEPTED","genus_name":"Hypsiprymnus","species_name":"lesueur","species_author":"Quoy
        \u0026 Gaimard, 1824","infrarank_author":null,"subpopulation_name":null,"infra_type":null,"infra_name":null}]}},{"assessment_year":"2022","weights":"Default","justification":"\u003cp\u003eThe
        Species Recovery Score of 57% (Moderately Depleted) is due to the Roat\u0026aacute;n
        Spiny-tailed Iguana being Absent in one spatial unit, Functional in three,
        and threatened (Present) in the remaining three. The Roat\u0026aacute;n Spiny-tailed
        Iguana has a Medium Conservation Legacy; without past conservation action,
        the Roat\u0026aacute;n Spiny-tailed Iguana would almost certainly be threatened
        throughout its entire range today. Conservation Dependence is Indeterminate;
        though the best estimate is that without continued conservation, the species
        could become extirpated in many spatial units over 10 years, there is uncertainty
        in this prediction. The Roat\u0026aacute;n Spiny-tailed Iguana has a Conservation
        Gain of Zero; within a 10-year period, the best estimate is that the score
        will not change. Finally, the best estimate is that over 100 years, the species
        could become Functional in most spatial units with sustained conservation
        effort, but there is uncertainty in this prediction. Therefore, the Recovery
        Potential for the Roat\u0026aacute;n Spiny-tailed Iguana is Indeterminate.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFor
        additional data, see the \u003ca href=\u0026quot;https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/gss-supplementary\u0026quot;
        target=\u0026quot;_self\u0026quot;\u003eSupplementary Information\u003c/a\u003e
        document.\u003c/p\u003e","species_recovery_category":"Moderately Depleted","species_recovery_score_best":"57%","species_recovery_score_minimum":"33%","species_recovery_score_maximum":"62%","conservation_legacy_category":"Medium","conservation_legacy_best":"29%","conservation_legacy_minimum":"0%","conservation_legacy_maximum":"48%","conservation_dependence_category":"Indeterminate","conservation_dependence_best":"52%","conservation_dependence_minimum":"-5%","conservation_dependence_maximum":"62%","conservation_gain_category":"Zero","conservation_gain_best":"0%","conservation_gain_minimum":"-14%","conservation_gain_maximum":"24%","recovery_potential_category":"Indeterminate","recovery_potential_best":"19%","recovery_potential_minimum":"-5%","recovery_potential_maximum":"52%","assessor_names":"Pasachnik,
        S.A., Grant, T.D. \u0026 Goode, A.B.C.","reviewer_names":"de Queiroz, K. \u0026
        Grace, M.K.","contributors":null,"facilitators":"Grace, M.K. \u0026 Young,
        R.E.","compilers":null,"url":"https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/44191/122558520","assessment_date":"2022-07-21","taxon":{"sis_id":44191,"scientific_name":"Ctenosaura
        oedirhina","species_taxa":[],"subpopulation_taxa":[],"infrarank_taxa":[],"kingdom_name":"ANIMALIA","phylum_name":"CHORDATA","class_name":"REPTILIA","order_name":"SQUAMATA","family_name":"IGUANIDAE","genus_name":"Ctenosaura","species_name":"oedirhina","subpopulation_name":null,"infra_name":null,"authority":"de
        Queiroz, 1987","species":true,"subpopulation":false,"infrarank":false,"ssc_groups":[{"name":"IUCN
        SSC Iguana Specialist Group","url":"http://www.iucn-isg.org/","description":"Co-Chairs:
        Stesha Pasachnik (email: sapasachnik@gmail.com) and Charles Knapp (email:
        cknapp@sheddaquarium.org)\nRed List Authority Coordinator: Tandora Grant (email:
        tgrant@sandiegozoo.org)\nNewsletter: http://www.iucn-isg.org/publications/archive-newsletters/"}],"common_names":[{"main":false,"name":"De
        Queiroz''s Spiny-tailed Iguana","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Wishywilly","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}},{"main":false,"name":"Garrobo","language":{"code":"spa","description":{"en":"Spanish;
        Castilian"}}},{"main":true,"name":"Roatán Spiny-tailed Iguana","language":{"code":"eng","description":{"en":"English"}}}],"synonyms":[]}}]}'
  recorded_at: 2024-09-18 16:03:53 GMT
  recorded_with: vcr/1.6.0, webmockr/1.0.0
